Crypto Deposit/ Withdrawal Guide – Binance Jersey

What means "LABEL" in BTC withdrawal address in Binance ?

What I need to add in that section ?
submitted by ocrnets to binance [link] [comments]

Can I know during withdrawal from Binance, there are label and address. What does label means? What am I supposed to paste there?

submitted by amy-lui to binance [link] [comments]

Withdraw from Binance. What does label mean?

i copy my hash address but it also requires a label. What is supposed to be typed into there? or can it be anything
submitted by audit157 to NEO [link] [comments]

Trying to withdraw from Binance to my wallet, they want a label before the address. What is this?

Trying to withdraw from Binance to my wallet, they want a label before the address. What is this? submitted by Derivatives_Trader to Iota [link] [comments]

Please can someone help me.... I was trying to withdraw Bitcoin from binance exchange but there's a space I have to fill up LABEL - please what should I write this space ??????????

submitted by kingcharlesuae to binance [link] [comments]

If I'm withdrawing BTC from Binance, what do I put in the "label" column?

submitted by happylittledancer123 to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Dragonchain Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off Public Proposal

Dragonchain Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off Public Proposal

Dragonchain Public Proposal TL;DR:

Dragonchain has demonstrated twice Reddit’s entire total daily volume (votes, comments, and posts per Reddit 2019 Year in Review) in a 24-hour demo on an operational network. Every single transaction on Dragonchain is decentralized immediately through 5 levels of Dragon Net, and then secured with combined proof on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, and Binance Chain, via Interchain. At the time, in January 2020, the entire cost of the demo was approximately $25K on a single system (transaction fees locked at $0.0001/txn). With current fees (lowest fee $0.0000025/txn), this would cost as little as $625.
Watch Joe walk through the entire proposal and answer questions on YouTube.
This proposal is also available on the Dragonchain blog.

Hello Reddit and Ethereum community!

I’m Joe Roets, Founder & CEO of Dragonchain. When the team and I first heard about The Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off we were intrigued. We believe we have the solutions Reddit seeks for its community points system and we have them at scale.
For your consideration, we have submitted our proposal below. The team at Dragonchain and I welcome and look forward to your technical questions, philosophical feedback, and fair criticism, to build a scaling solution for Reddit that will empower its users. Because our architecture is unlike other blockchain platforms out there today, we expect to receive many questions while people try to grasp our project. I will answer all questions here in this thread on Reddit, and I've answered some questions in the stream on YouTube.
We have seen good discussions so far in the competition. We hope that Reddit’s scaling solution will emerge from The Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off and that Reddit will have great success with the implementation.

Executive summary

Dragonchain is a robust open source hybrid blockchain platform that has proven to withstand the passing of time since our inception in 2014. We have continued to evolve to harness the scalability of private nodes, yet take full advantage of the security of public decentralized networks, like Ethereum. We have a live, operational, and fully functional Interchain network integrating Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, and ~700 independent Dragonchain nodes. Every transaction is secured to Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Ethereum Classic. Transactions are immediately usable on chain, and the first decentralization is seen within 20 seconds on Dragon Net. Security increases further to public networks ETH, BTC, and ETC within 10 minutes to 2 hours. Smart contracts can be written in any executable language, offering full freedom to existing developers. We invite any developer to watch the demo, play with our SDK’s, review open source code, and to help us move forward. Dragonchain specializes in scalable loyalty & rewards solutions and has built a decentralized social network on chain, with very affordable transaction costs. This experience can be combined with the insights Reddit and the Ethereum community have gained in the past couple of months to roll out the solution at a rapid pace.

Response and PoC

In The Great Reddit Scaling Bake-Off post, Reddit has asked for a series of demonstrations, requirements, and other considerations. In this section, we will attempt to answer all of these requests.

Live Demo

A live proof of concept showing hundreds of thousands of transactions
On Jan 7, 2020, Dragonchain hosted a 24-hour live demonstration during which a quarter of a billion (250 million+) transactions executed fully on an operational network. Every single transaction on Dragonchain is decentralized immediately through 5 levels of Dragon Net, and then secured with combined proof on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, and Binance Chain, via Interchain. This means that every single transaction is secured by, and traceable to these networks. An attack on this system would require a simultaneous attack on all of the Interchained networks.
24 hours in 4 minutes (YouTube):
24 hours in 4 minutes
The demonstration was of a single business system, and any user is able to scale this further, by running multiple systems simultaneously. Our goals for the event were to demonstrate a consistent capacity greater than that of Visa over an extended time period.
Tooling to reproduce our demo is available here:
https://github.com/dragonchain/spirit-bomb

Source Code

Source code (for on & off-chain components as well tooling used for the PoC). The source code does not have to be shared publicly, but if Reddit decides to use a particular solution it will need to be shared with Reddit at some point.

Scaling

How it works & scales

Architectural Scaling

Dragonchain’s architecture attacks the scalability issue from multiple angles. Dragonchain is a hybrid blockchain platform, wherein every transaction is protected on a business node to the requirements of that business or purpose. A business node may be held completely private or may be exposed or replicated to any level of exposure desired.
Every node has its own blockchain and is independently scalable. Dragonchain established Context Based Verification as its consensus model. Every transaction is immediately usable on a trust basis, and in time is provable to an increasing level of decentralized consensus. A transaction will have a level of decentralization to independently owned and deployed Dragonchain nodes (~700 nodes) within seconds, and full decentralization to BTC and ETH within minutes or hours. Level 5 nodes (Interchain nodes) function to secure all transactions to public or otherwise external chains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. These nodes scale the system by aggregating multiple blocks into a single Interchain transaction on a cadence. This timing is configurable based upon average fees for each respective chain. For detailed information about Dragonchain’s architecture, and Context Based Verification, please refer to the Dragonchain Architecture Document.

Economic Scaling

An interesting feature of Dragonchain’s network consensus is its economics and scarcity model. Since Dragon Net nodes (L2-L4) are independent staking nodes, deployment to cloud platforms would allow any of these nodes to scale to take on a large percentage of the verification work. This is great for scalability, but not good for the economy, because there is no scarcity, and pricing would develop a downward spiral and result in fewer verification nodes. For this reason, Dragonchain uses TIME as scarcity.
TIME is calculated as the number of Dragons held, multiplied by the number of days held. TIME influences the user’s access to features within the Dragonchain ecosystem. It takes into account both the Dragon balance and length of time each Dragon is held. TIME is staked by users against every verification node and dictates how much of the transaction fees are awarded to each participating node for every block.
TIME also dictates the transaction fee itself for the business node. TIME is staked against a business node to set a deterministic transaction fee level (see transaction fee table below in Cost section). This is very interesting in a discussion about scaling because it guarantees independence for business implementation. No matter how much traffic appears on the entire network, a business is guaranteed to not see an increased transaction fee rate.

Scaled Deployment

Dragonchain uses Docker and Kubernetes to allow the use of best practices traditional system scaling. Dragonchain offers managed nodes with an easy to use web based console interface. The user may also deploy a Dragonchain node within their own datacenter or favorite cloud platform. Users have deployed Dragonchain nodes on-prem on Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, MS Azure, and other hosting platforms around the world. Any executable code, anything you can write, can be written into a smart contract. This flexibility is what allows us to say that developers with no blockchain experience can use any code language to access the benefits of blockchain. Customers have used NodeJS, Python, Java, and even BASH shell script to write smart contracts on Dragonchain.
With Docker containers, we achieve better separation of concerns, faster deployment, higher reliability, and lower response times.
We chose Kubernetes for its self-healing features, ability to run multiple services on one server, and its large and thriving development community. It is resilient, scalable, and automated. OpenFaaS allows us to package smart contracts as Docker images for easy deployment.
Contract deployment time is now bounded only by the size of the Docker image being deployed but remains fast even for reasonably large images. We also take advantage of Docker’s flexibility and its ability to support any language that can run on x86 architecture. Any image, public or private, can be run as a smart contract using Dragonchain.

Flexibility in Scaling

Dragonchain’s architecture considers interoperability and integration as key features. From inception, we had a goal to increase adoption via integration with real business use cases and traditional systems.
We envision the ability for Reddit, in the future, to be able to integrate alternate content storage platforms or other financial services along with the token.
  • LBRY - To allow users to deploy content natively to LBRY
  • MakerDAO to allow users to lend small amounts backed by their Reddit community points.
  • STORJ/SIA to allow decentralized on chain storage of portions of content. These integrations or any other are relatively easy to integrate on Dragonchain with an Interchain implementation.

Cost

Cost estimates (on-chain and off-chain) For the purpose of this proposal, we assume that all transactions are on chain (posts, replies, and votes).
On the Dragonchain network, transaction costs are deterministic/predictable. By staking TIME on the business node (as described above) Reddit can reduce transaction costs to as low as $0.0000025 per transaction.
Dragonchain Fees Table

Getting Started

How to run it
Building on Dragonchain is simple and requires no blockchain experience. Spin up a business node (L1) in our managed environment (AWS), run it in your own cloud environment, or on-prem in your own datacenter. Clear documentation will walk you through the steps of spinning up your first Dragonchain Level 1 Business node.
Getting started is easy...
  1. Download Dragonchain’s dctl
  2. Input three commands into a terminal
  3. Build an image
  4. Run it
More information can be found in our Get started documents.

Architecture
Dragonchain is an open source hybrid platform. Through Dragon Net, each chain combines the power of a public blockchain (like Ethereum) with the privacy of a private blockchain.
Dragonchain organizes its network into five separate levels. A Level 1, or business node, is a totally private blockchain only accessible through the use of public/private keypairs. All business logic, including smart contracts, can be executed on this node directly and added to the chain.
After creating a block, the Level 1 business node broadcasts a version stripped of sensitive private data to Dragon Net. Three Level 2 Validating nodes validate the transaction based on guidelines determined from the business. A Level 3 Diversity node checks that the level 2 nodes are from a diverse array of locations. A Level 4 Notary node, hosted by a KYC partner, then signs the validation record received from the Level 3 node. The transaction hash is ledgered to the Level 5 public chain to take advantage of the hash power of massive public networks.
Dragon Net can be thought of as a “blockchain of blockchains”, where every level is a complete private blockchain. Because an L1 can send to multiple nodes on a single level, proof of existence is distributed among many places in the network. Eventually, proof of existence reaches level 5 and is published on a public network.

API Documentation

APIs (on chain & off)

SDK Source

Nobody’s Perfect

Known issues or tradeoffs
  • Dragonchain is open source and even though the platform is easy enough for developers to code in any language they are comfortable with, we do not have so large a developer community as Ethereum. We would like to see the Ethereum developer community (and any other communities) become familiar with our SDK’s, our solutions, and our platform, to unlock the full potential of our Ethereum Interchain. Long ago we decided to prioritize both Bitcoin and Ethereum Interchains. We envision an ecosystem that encompasses different projects to give developers the ability to take full advantage of all the opportunities blockchain offers to create decentralized solutions not only for Reddit but for all of our current platforms and systems. We believe that together we will take the adoption of blockchain further. We currently have additional Interchain with Ethereum Classic. We look forward to Interchain with other blockchains in the future. We invite all blockchains projects who believe in decentralization and security to Interchain with Dragonchain.
  • While we only have 700 nodes compared to 8,000 Ethereum and 10,000 Bitcoin nodes. We harness those 18,000 nodes to scale to extremely high levels of security. See Dragonchain metrics.
  • Some may consider the centralization of Dragonchain’s business nodes as an issue at first glance, however, the model is by design to protect business data. We do not consider this a drawback as these nodes can make any, none, or all data public. Depending upon the implementation, every subreddit could have control of its own business node, for potential business and enterprise offerings, bringing new alternative revenue streams to Reddit.

Costs and resources

Summary of cost & resource information for both on-chain & off-chain components used in the PoC, as well as cost & resource estimates for further scaling. If your PoC is not on mainnet, make note of any mainnet caveats (such as congestion issues).
Every transaction on the PoC system had a transaction fee of $0.0001 (one-hundredth of a cent USD). At 256MM transactions, the demo cost $25,600. With current operational fees, the same demonstration would cost $640 USD.
For the demonstration, to achieve throughput to mimic a worldwide payments network, we modeled several clients in AWS and 4-5 business nodes to handle the traffic. The business nodes were tuned to handle higher throughput by adjusting memory and machine footprint on AWS. This flexibility is valuable to implementing a system such as envisioned by Reddit. Given that Reddit’s daily traffic (posts, replies, and votes) is less than half that of our demo, we would expect that the entire Reddit system could be handled on 2-5 business nodes using right-sized containers on AWS or similar environments.
Verification was accomplished on the operational Dragon Net network with over 700 independently owned verification nodes running around the world at no cost to the business other than paid transaction fees.

Requirements

Scaling

This PoC should scale to the numbers below with minimal costs (both on & off-chain). There should also be a clear path to supporting hundreds of millions of users.
Over a 5 day period, your scaling PoC should be able to handle:
*100,000 point claims (minting & distributing points) *25,000 subscriptions *75,000 one-off points burning *100,000 transfers
During Dragonchain’s 24 hour demo, the above required numbers were reached within the first few minutes.
Reddit’s total activity is 9000% more than Ethereum’s total transaction level. Even if you do not include votes, it is still 700% more than Ethereum’s current volume. Dragonchain has demonstrated that it can handle 250 million transactions a day, and it’s architecture allows for multiple systems to work at that level simultaneously. In our PoC, we demonstrate double the full capacity of Reddit, and every transaction was proven all the way to Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Reddit Scaling on Ethereum

Decentralization

Solutions should not depend on any single third-party provider. We prefer solutions that do not depend on specific entities such as Reddit or another provider, and solutions with no single point of control or failure in off-chain components but recognize there are numerous trade-offs to consider
Dragonchain’s architecture calls for a hybrid approach. Private business nodes hold the sensitive data while the validation and verification of transactions for the business are decentralized within seconds and secured to public blockchains within 10 minutes to 2 hours. Nodes could potentially be controlled by owners of individual subreddits for more organic decentralization.
  • Billing is currently centralized - there is a path to federation and decentralization of a scaled billing solution.
  • Operational multi-cloud
  • Operational on-premises capabilities
  • Operational deployment to any datacenter
  • Over 700 independent Community Verification Nodes with proof of ownership
  • Operational Interchain (Interoperable to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ethereum Classic, open to more)

Usability Scaling solutions should have a simple end user experience.

Users shouldn't have to maintain any extra state/proofs, regularly monitor activity, keep track of extra keys, or sign anything other than their normal transactions
Dragonchain and its customers have demonstrated extraordinary usability as a feature in many applications, where users do not need to know that the system is backed by a live blockchain. Lyceum is one of these examples, where the progress of academy courses is being tracked, and successful completion of courses is rewarded with certificates on chain. Our @Save_The_Tweet bot is popular on Twitter. When used with one of the following hashtags - #please, #blockchain, #ThankYou, or #eternalize the tweet is saved through Eternal to multiple blockchains. A proof report is available for future reference. Other examples in use are DEN, our decentralized social media platform, and our console, where users can track their node rewards, view their TIME, and operate a business node.
Examples:

Transactions complete in a reasonable amount of time (seconds or minutes, not hours or days)
All transactions are immediately usable on chain by the system. A transaction begins the path to decentralization at the conclusion of a 5-second block when it gets distributed across 5 separate community run nodes. Full decentralization occurs within 10 minutes to 2 hours depending on which interchain (Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Ethereum Classic) the transaction hits first. Within approximately 2 hours, the combined hash power of all interchained blockchains secures the transaction.

Free to use for end users (no gas fees, or fixed/minimal fees that Reddit can pay on their behalf)
With transaction pricing as low as $0.0000025 per transaction, it may be considered reasonable for Reddit to cover transaction fees for users.
All of Reddit's Transactions on Blockchain (month)
Community points can be earned by users and distributed directly to their Reddit account in batch (as per Reddit minting plan), and allow users to withdraw rewards to their Ethereum wallet whenever they wish. Withdrawal fees can be paid by either user or Reddit. This model has been operating inside the Dragonchain system since 2018, and many security and financial compliance features can be optionally added. We feel that this capability greatly enhances user experience because it is seamless to a regular user without cryptocurrency experience, yet flexible to a tech savvy user. With regard to currency or token transactions, these would occur on the Reddit network, verified to BTC and ETH. These transactions would incur the $0.0000025 transaction fee. To estimate this fee we use the monthly active Reddit users statista with a 60% adoption rate and an estimated 10 transactions per month average resulting in an approximate $720 cost across the system. Reddit could feasibly incur all associated internal network charges (mining/minting, transfer, burn) as these are very low and controllable fees.
Reddit Internal Token Transaction Fees

Reddit Ethereum Token Transaction Fees
When we consider further the Ethereum fees that might be incurred, we have a few choices for a solution.
  1. Offload all Ethereum transaction fees (user withdrawals) to interested users as they wish to withdraw tokens for external use or sale.
  2. Cover Ethereum transaction fees by aggregating them on a timed schedule. Users would request withdrawal (from Reddit or individual subreddits), and they would be transacted on the Ethereum network every hour (or some other schedule).
  3. In a combination of the above, customers could cover aggregated fees.
  4. Integrate with alternate Ethereum roll up solutions or other proposals to aggregate minting and distribution transactions onto Ethereum.

Bonus Points

Users should be able to view their balances & transactions via a blockchain explorer-style interface
From interfaces for users who have no knowledge of blockchain technology to users who are well versed in blockchain terms such as those present in a typical block explorer, a system powered by Dragonchain has flexibility on how to provide balances and transaction data to users. Transactions can be made viewable in an Eternal Proof Report, which displays raw data along with TIME staking information and traceability all the way to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and every other Interchained network. The report shows fields such as transaction ID, timestamp, block ID, multiple verifications, and Interchain proof. See example here.
Node payouts within the Dragonchain console are listed in chronological order and can be further seen in either Dragons or USD. See example here.
In our social media platform, Dragon Den, users can see, in real-time, their NRG and MTR balances. See example here.
A new influencer app powered by Dragonchain, Raiinmaker, breaks down data into a user friendly interface that shows coin portfolio, redeemed rewards, and social scores per campaign. See example here.

Exiting is fast & simple
Withdrawing funds on Dragonchain’s console requires three clicks, however, withdrawal scenarios with more enhanced security features per Reddit’s discretion are obtainable.

Interoperability Compatibility with third party apps (wallets/contracts/etc) is necessary.
Proven interoperability at scale that surpasses the required specifications. Our entire platform consists of interoperable blockchains connected to each other and traditional systems. APIs are well documented. Third party permissions are possible with a simple smart contract without the end user being aware. No need to learn any specialized proprietary language. Any code base (not subsets) is usable within a Docker container. Interoperable with any blockchain or traditional APIs. We’ve witnessed relatively complex systems built by engineers with no blockchain or cryptocurrency experience. We’ve also demonstrated the creation of smart contracts within minutes built with BASH shell and Node.js. Please see our source code and API documentation.

Scaling solutions should be extensible and allow third parties to build on top of it Open source and extensible
APIs should be well documented and stable

Documentation should be clear and complete
For full documentation, explore our docs, SDK’s, Github repo’s, architecture documents, original Disney documentation, and other links or resources provided in this proposal.

Third-party permissionless integrations should be possible & straightforward Smart contracts are Docker based, can be written in any language, use full language (not subsets), and can therefore be integrated with any system including traditional system APIs. Simple is better. Learning an uncommon or proprietary language should not be necessary.
Advanced knowledge of mathematics, cryptography, or L2 scaling should not be required. Compatibility with common utilities & toolchains is expected.
Dragonchain business nodes and smart contracts leverage Docker to allow the use of literally any language or executable code. No proprietary language is necessary. We’ve witnessed relatively complex systems built by engineers with no blockchain or cryptocurrency experience. We’ve also demonstrated the creation of smart contracts within minutes built with BASH shell and Node.js.

Bonus

Bonus Points: Show us how it works. Do you have an idea for a cool new use case for Community Points? Build it!

TIME

Community points could be awarded to Reddit users based upon TIME too, whereas the longer someone is part of a subreddit, the more community points someone naturally gained, even if not actively commenting or sharing new posts. A daily login could be required for these community points to be credited. This grants awards to readers too and incentivizes readers to create an account on Reddit if they browse the website often. This concept could also be leveraged to provide some level of reputation based upon duration and consistency of contribution to a community subreddit.

Dragon Den

Dragonchain has already built a social media platform that harnesses community involvement. Dragon Den is a decentralized community built on the Dragonchain blockchain platform. Dragon Den is Dragonchain’s answer to fake news, trolling, and censorship. It incentivizes the creation and evaluation of quality content within communities. It could be described as being a shareholder of a subreddit or Reddit in its entirety. The more your subreddit is thriving, the more rewarding it will be. Den is currently in a public beta and in active development, though the real token economy is not live yet. There are different tokens for various purposes. Two tokens are Lair Ownership Rights (LOR) and Lair Ownership Tokens (LOT). LOT is a non-fungible token for ownership of a specific Lair. LOT will only be created and converted from LOR.
Energy (NRG) and Matter (MTR) work jointly. Your MTR determines how much NRG you receive in a 24-hour period. Providing quality content, or evaluating content will earn MTR.

Security. Users have full ownership & control of their points.
All community points awarded based upon any type of activity or gift, are secured and provable to all Interchain networks (currently BTC, ETH, ETC). Users are free to spend and withdraw their points as they please, depending on the features Reddit wants to bring into production.

Balances and transactions cannot be forged, manipulated, or blocked by Reddit or anyone else
Users can withdraw their balance to their ERC20 wallet, directly through Reddit. Reddit can cover the fees on their behalf, or the user covers this with a portion of their balance.

Users should own their points and be able to get on-chain ERC20 tokens without permission from anyone else
Through our console users can withdraw their ERC20 rewards. This can be achieved on Reddit too. Here is a walkthrough of our console, though this does not show the quick withdrawal functionality, a user can withdraw at any time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlTMxnfVHw

Points should be recoverable to on-chain ERC20 tokens even if all third-parties involved go offline
If necessary, signed transactions from the Reddit system (e.g. Reddit + Subreddit) can be sent to the Ethereum smart contract for minting.

A public, third-party review attesting to the soundness of the design should be available
To our knowledge, at least two large corporations, including a top 3 accounting firm, have conducted positive reviews. These reviews have never been made public, as Dragonchain did not pay or contract for these studies to be released.

Bonus points
Public, third-party implementation review available or in progress
See above

Compatibility with HSMs & hardware wallets
For the purpose of this proposal, all tokenization would be on the Ethereum network using standard token contracts and as such, would be able to leverage all hardware wallet and Ethereum ecosystem services.

Other Considerations

Minting/distributing tokens is not performed by Reddit directly
This operation can be automated by smart contract on Ethereum. Subreddits can if desired have a role to play.

One off point burning, as well as recurring, non-interactive point burning (for subreddit memberships) should be possible and scalable
This is possible and scalable with interaction between Dragonchain Reddit system and Ethereum token contract(s).

Fully open-source solutions are strongly preferred
Dragonchain is fully open source (see section on Disney release after conclusion).

Conclusion

Whether it is today, or in the future, we would like to work together to bring secure flexibility to the highest standards. It is our hope to be considered by Ethereum, Reddit, and other integrative solutions so we may further discuss the possibilities of implementation. In our public demonstration, 256 million transactions were handled in our operational network on chain in 24 hours, for the low cost of $25K, which if run today would cost $625. Dragonchain’s interoperable foundation provides the atmosphere necessary to implement a frictionless community points system. Thank you for your consideration of our proposal. We look forward to working with the community to make something great!

Disney Releases Blockchain Platform as Open Source

The team at Disney created the Disney Private Blockchain Platform. The system was a hybrid interoperable blockchain platform for ledgering and smart contract development geared toward solving problems with blockchain adoption and usability. All objective evaluation would consider the team’s output a success. We released a list of use cases that we explored in some capacity at Disney, and our input on blockchain standardization as part of our participation in the W3C Blockchain Community Group.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-blockchain/2016May/0052.html

Open Source

In 2016, Roets proposed to release the platform as open source to spread the technology outside of Disney, as others within the W3C group were interested in the solutions that had been created inside of Disney.
Following a long process, step by step, the team met requirements for release. Among the requirements, the team had to:
  • Obtain VP support and approval for the release
  • Verify ownership of the software to be released
  • Verify that no proprietary content would be released
  • Convince the organization that there was a value to the open source community
  • Convince the organization that there was a value to Disney
  • Offer the plan for ongoing maintenance of the project outside of Disney
  • Itemize competing projects
  • Verify no conflict of interest
  • Preferred license
  • Change the project name to not use the name Disney, any Disney character, or any other associated IP - proposed Dragonchain - approved
  • Obtain legal approval
  • Approval from corporate, parks, and other business units
  • Approval from multiple Disney patent groups Copyright holder defined by Disney (Disney Connected and Advanced Technologies)
  • Trademark searches conducted for the selected name Dragonchain
  • Obtain IT security approval
  • Manual review of OSS components conducted
  • OWASP Dependency and Vulnerability Check Conducted
  • Obtain technical (software) approval
  • Offer management, process, and financial plans for the maintenance of the project.
  • Meet list of items to be addressed before release
  • Remove all Disney project references and scripts
  • Create a public distribution list for email communications
  • Remove Roets’ direct and internal contact information
  • Create public Slack channel and move from Disney slack channels
  • Create proper labels for issue tracking
  • Rename internal private Github repository
  • Add informative description to Github page
  • Expand README.md with more specific information
  • Add information beyond current “Blockchains are Magic”
  • Add getting started sections and info on cloning/forking the project
  • Add installation details
  • Add uninstall process
  • Add unit, functional, and integration test information
  • Detail how to contribute and get involved
  • Describe the git workflow that the project will use
  • Move to public, non-Disney git repository (Github or Bitbucket)
  • Obtain Disney Open Source Committee approval for release
On top of meeting the above criteria, as part of the process, the maintainer of the project had to receive the codebase on their own personal email and create accounts for maintenance (e.g. Github) with non-Disney accounts. Given the fact that the project spanned multiple business units, Roets was individually responsible for its ongoing maintenance. Because of this, he proposed in the open source application to create a non-profit organization to hold the IP and maintain the project. This was approved by Disney.
The Disney Open Source Committee approved the application known as OSSRELEASE-10, and the code was released on October 2, 2016. Disney decided to not issue a press release.
Original OSSRELASE-10 document

Dragonchain Foundation

The Dragonchain Foundation was created on January 17, 2017. https://den.social/l/Dragonchain/24130078352e485d96d2125082151cf0/dragonchain-and-disney/
submitted by j0j0r0 to ethereum [link] [comments]

FunFair Tokenomics 2020 - FunFair's FUN token and how it aligns incentives across 6 distinct groups of stakeholders to create a compelling gaming platform

FunFair has come a long way since I started following the team in 2017, recently adding a Japanese casino (the fourth casino now in the network), in-wallet purchase of FUN with credit/debit cards, the removal of the need for ETH to cover gas charges, browser and device-independent play, an easy to use wallet and a raft of new games.
Unlike many crypto projects where tokens were seen primarily as a fund-raising approach, the FUN token provides significant utility by coordinating the activities and incentives of the six stakeholder types within the FunFair ecosystem:
  1. FUN Token Holders
  2. Casino Players
  3. Affiliates and Referral Partners
  4. Licensed Operators and White Labels (Casinos)
  5. Game Developers
  6. Gaming Regulators
For me, the FUN token is THE perfect example of a project where the token has significant utility in aligning incentives across disparate stakeholders and is a poster child for effective tokenomics.
Here's my personal view on the value propositions and incentives for each of these groups:

FUN Token Holders

Casino Players

Affiliate and Referral Partners

Licensed Operators and White Labels (Casinos)

Game Developers

Gaming Regulators

As you can see, the value to each stakeholder is considerable - especially when compared to the current legacy technology - which is why I'm bullish that FunFair will be successful in achieving its mission of truly reinventing this industry.
What do you think? Do you see other value props? Let me know and I'll add them to the list!
submitted by dwrcrypto to FunfairTech [link] [comments]

(CEX vs DEX) vs HEX

A hybrid crypto exchange is a platform that provides users with access to their private keys and aims to solve the scalability issues of decentralized exchanges.
*Disclaimer: I don’t insist that one have to store 100% of the portfolio on any kind of exchange.

Why is it called Hybrid exchange?
Hybrid crypto exchanges combine the pros of Centralized crypto exchanges and Decentralized crypto exchanges. The hybrid concept allows for certain cons to be remedied by implementing the advantages of the opposite.

What are Centralized and Decentralized exchanges?
Centralized(CEX) crypto exchanges provide massive volatility with the help of market-making activities.
Occasional fiat gateways for its users, so everyone could quickly cash out gainings.
Besides, substantial centralized crypto exchanges have a higher trust score within the community.

Decentralized(DEX) crypto exchanges provide a solution to the security issues by letting users be in control of their private keys. This feature is a part of the real decentralization of trust philosophy, which is essential for the whole crypto economy.

DEX vs CEX





On the one hand, DEX’s provide higher security and privacy for its users, but those aren't the only things we are looking for. On the other hand, CEX’s, as I told earlier, have a higher trust score, so what does this mean exactly?


But is their royalty deserved?
“I definitely hope centralized exchanges go burn in hell as much as possible,” Vitalik Buterin stated in 2018. In particular, he thinks there’s no reason some projects need to pay $10 to $15 million(as per 2018) in listing fees to let people trade their tokens on centralized exchanges.
This feels like a blood diamonds issue in the diamond industry. Most of those platforms were built on lies, some of them are currently building themselves out on falsehoods.

CEXs have to be regulatory compliant, it’s impossible to be obedient without registering a company, submitting documents for proof of identity, etc. Most of the legal registries are opened to the public. Hence the founders are publicly known individuals. Besides, there is no need to hide while you are compliant and not involved in illegal activities.



If you are new to this industry, or do not want to understand the intricacies of blockchains and came here to trade Bitcoin, I advise you to use a CEX.
But If you came here for the tech, you will enjoy reading this more.

What is the hybrid crypto exchange approach?
Not so long ago, I decided to dive into the topic of hybrid exchanges as a potential game-changer in the cryptocurrency industry.
The hybrid exchange philosophy builds on the strengths of decentralized and centralized exchanges. During my research, I came across a curious example - NEXT.exchange
To further simplify the process of understanding the principles of hybrid exchanges, I propose to consider this topic by case. It’s worth noting that there is much to contemplate in regards to hybrid exchange platforms, their solutions and approaches may vary. There are also not many out there.

DEX pros within NEXT:

Essentially NEXT.chain will be used by the exchange as an open database that stores information about all transactions and tokenized assets (assets created on NEXT.chain are dubbed 00X standard) within the exchange.
To maintain the blockchain, investors will deploy 100 master nodes during the first year (79 out of 100 are already functioning).





CEX pros within NEXT:



It’s important to note that NEXT is just at its start, and will be releasing a huge update dubbed 2.0 (after a testing period with its community), so if hybrid cryptocurrency exchanges are interesting to you - then this is definitely one to keep an eye out for.

Summing up
Recently, the industry of centralized crypto-exchanges is literally filled with scammers.
Teams of second-rate centralized exchanges "draw" trading volumes and even IEO results. Unfortunately, many blindly believe them. This is going to be a massive problem in the future, more important than you can imagine. Those scam exchanges will become more prominent and will swindle more people, this will lead to a severe outflow of defrauded people from the industry, which can not afford it.
Hybrid cryptocurrency exchanges are a new trend that I think can improve the whole industry.
Not all hybrid exchanges have their own blockchain, NEXT was considered as the project most suitable for the description of a hybrid cryptocurrency exchange.
Don't FOMO and don't hesitate to do your own researches before depositing funds on the exchange wallets or participating in an IEO.
submitted by SUN_STRIKE to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

Binance has enabled EOS deposits!

https://eostracker.io/accounts/binancecleos
submitted by Eoslong to eos [link] [comments]

Trustless DeFi SaaS for crypto-to-crypto OTC

Trustless DeFi SaaS for crypto-to-crypto OTC

Market size

Last three years Over-The-Counter cryptocurrency market keeps on growing in volume and clients amount across the globe according to many reports of brokers and companies involved in the process.
OTC turnover in 2018 amounted to more than 5.47 trillion USD equivalent1.

Daily volume 2019


https://preview.redd.it/8uvirrkbby841.png?width=450&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff6182da6a00be6339c262866238276864233f2e

The research part from Capco
1 Based on reports by Bloomberg, Bravenewcoin, Circle, Statista, CCN and 10+ another sources.
2 Crypto exchanges volume
3 DEX daily volume


Why OTC broker (instead of a crypto exchange)?


  • Lack of liquidity — crypto exchanges have low liquidity. OTC desks are good for pushing through large trade orders searching for market liquidity.
  • Price protection, Anonymity — OTC is good for moving large orders which avoids impacting the price, e.g. 1,000 BTC. Order depth will not show up like it does on an exchange.
  • No fiat onramp — few crypto exchanges have a fiat onramp (though Binance is working on it and already have some solutions in place in Asia).
  • Avoid price ‘slippage’ — price slippage occurs on exchanges when the executed price is different to the expected price.
  • Avoid prohibitive crypto exchange limits — the majority of crypto exchanges have prohibitive trading limits. For example, Coinbase limits purchases to $25,000 per day. Kraken only lets you withdraw $2,500 per day and $20,000 per month. Circle imposes withdrawal limit of $3,000 per week.

Who are the main buyers and sellers?

At the moment, the main buyers are hedge funds and the main sellers are miners. In Oct 2018, it was reported in Reddit Rumours that hedge funds were buying large volumes from miners. The main participants trading crypto OTC are:
  • Hedge funds, smaller asset managers, family offices (buyers).
  • Miners (sellers).
  • Regulated broker-dealers (on account).
  • Crypto exchange OTC desks (on account).

What are the main problems?

  • Settlement risk — there is no guarantee the asset will be delivered, or cash will be paid. Coin transfer often happens much faster than the wire payment transfer (often by several hours).
  • No custody solution — most OTC brokers don’t provide a custody solution (or provide a very limited service), which can increase settlement and operational risk.
  • Multi-jurisdictional KYC issues — dealing with countries with poor KYC regulations can be a deal breaker.
  • If you execute through an OTC broker you need, for example, to deliverthe ETH to the broker. There is no guarantee the broker's client will pay.
  • The larger the order the greater the risk of default with multiple counterparties.
  • OTC crypto is missing the monitoring and surveillance tools of traditional trading systems.

What we do?

ROX Capital AG team is working on Decentralised Finance technology which brings fully trustless direct asset exchange tools to customers of OTC companies and crypto exchanges.
ROX is designed the platform that helps to build trust between exchange members based on a trustless technology which retains assets control by beneficiaries on any stage of a process.
The system of Smart Contracts provides a simple tool that help participants exchange Proof-of-Funds in seconds without moving funds to a broker or third party escrow until needed amount and price requirements achieved from both sides.

https://preview.redd.it/whg9i0tfby841.png?width=2030&format=png&auto=webp&s=cef1a68fe3b1bdf0e958cbdc6b8f72736b2ec613

Features

  • SaaS Provider for OTC and other Institutionals
  • Trustless Smart Contract Network4
  • Impersonal Orders with Proof-of-Funds from KYC Verified Members
  • Integration with third party OTC desk
  • Referral program for Agents and Deal Merge Fee Trustee
  • Onchain trustless deals initiate by manager or beneficiary
  • Cross-chain5 Trustless DLT System
4 Trustless Network is based on blockchain opportunities, the system provides manager or beneficiary to setup terms for each deal, including price, referral fee amount, choose exact whitelisted tokens for both sides of exchange, also minimum transaction volume or fix lot for change. The all details are transparent and available in blockchain comments and through the provided interface for both sides.
5 On the first stage we provide Ethereum ERC-20 based MVP which is demonstrate the concept and during the public Beta-test continue working with Bitcoin blockchain integration stability.

Two or more OTC brokers can merge any deal, set-up needed fee size and share it through built in partner program.
Time is saved for all market participants — from agreement to transfer receipt both sides could spend less than 1 hour, instead of days or weeks.
Anonymity is protected — large impersonal reliable orders and no needed meetings anymore.
As the majority of brokers execute based on Request for Quote (RFQ) and ‘Fill or Kill’ (FOK). That’s why we created four types of contracts:
  1. FOK with two participants and fix lot order.
  2. FOK with two participants and minimum order amount.
  3. One side offer can be filled with unlimited transactions from second side and minimum order amount.
  4. One side offer can be filled with unlimited transactions from second side with fix lot order.
Contracts can be declined by initiator any time before lot or minimum order amount fulfilment. If declined, all funds returns to senders without any fees. Same as escrow but trustless.

Options

ROXY provides:
  1. Web app cabinet, where broker prepare a deal in three simple steps: choosing contract type, fill up details (tokens for buyer and seller, price, lot/minimum amount, fee, other additional details) and creates contract with transparent accepted by participants terms.
  2. White label integration.
The service is provided under an agreement B2B to a companies authorised to proceed exchanges of crypto assets for their customers according to regulatory agreements in the countries where entities operating.


ROXY launch Q1, 2020Early access is going in January
[Request for beta](mailto:[email protected])
Follow updates in telegram channel.
submitted by mrAlexRoyce to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Trustless DeFi SaaS for crypto-to-crypto OTC

Trustless DeFi SaaS for crypto-to-crypto OTC

Market size

Last three years Over-The-Counter cryptocurrency market keeps on growing in volume and clients amount across the globe according to many reports of brokers and companies involved in the process.
OTC turnover in 2018 amounted to more than 5.47 trillion USD equivalent1.

Daily volume 2019

https://preview.redd.it/gukxa53fmd841.png?width=450&format=png&auto=webp&s=056156f7d62624e35395a5a41cacbb7a93432115
The research part from Capco
1 Based on reports by Bloomberg, Bravenewcoin, Circle, Statista, CCN and 10+ another sources.
2 Crypto exchanges volume
3 DEX daily volume


Why OTC broker (instead of a crypto exchange)?


  • Lack of liquidity — crypto exchanges have low liquidity. OTC desks are good for pushing through large trade orders searching for market liquidity.
  • Price protection, Anonymity — OTC is good for moving large orders which avoids impacting the price, e.g. 1,000 BTC. Order depth will not show up like it does on an exchange.
  • No fiat onramp — few crypto exchanges have a fiat onramp (though Binance is working on it and already have some solutions in place in Asia).
  • Avoid price ‘slippage’ — price slippage occurs on exchanges when the executed price is different to the expected price.
  • Avoid prohibitive crypto exchange limits — the majority of crypto exchanges have prohibitive trading limits. For example, Coinbase limits purchases to $25,000 per day. Kraken only lets you withdraw $2,500 per day and $20,000 per month. Circle imposes withdrawal limit of $3,000 per week.

Who are the main buyers and sellers?

At the moment, the main buyers are hedge funds and the main sellers are miners. In Oct 2018, it was reported in Reddit Rumours that hedge funds were buying large volumes from miners. The main participants trading crypto OTC are:
  • Hedge funds, smaller asset managers, family offices (buyers).
  • Miners (sellers).
  • Regulated broker-dealers (on account).
  • Crypto exchange OTC desks (on account).

What are the main problems?

  • Settlement risk — there is no guarantee the asset will be delivered, or cash will be paid. Coin transfer often happens much faster than the wire payment transfer (often by several hours).
  • No custody solution — most OTC brokers don’t provide a custody solution (or provide a very limited service), which can increase settlement and operational risk.
  • Multi-jurisdictional KYC issues — dealing with countries with poor KYC regulations can be a deal breaker.
  • If you execute through an OTC broker you need, for example, to deliverthe ETH to the broker. There is no guarantee the broker's client will pay.
  • The larger the order the greater the risk of default with multiple counterparties.
  • OTC crypto is missing the monitoring and surveillance tools of traditional trading systems.

What we do?

ROX Capital AG team is working on Decentralised Finance technology which brings fully trustless direct asset exchange tools to customers of OTC companies and crypto exchanges.
ROX is designed the platform that helps to build trust between exchange members based on a trustless technology which retains assets control by beneficiaries on any stage of a process.
The system of Smart Contracts provides a simple tool that help participants exchange Proof-of-Funds in seconds without moving funds to a broker or third party escrow until needed amount and price requirements achieved from both sides.
https://preview.redd.it/oesc6lynmd841.png?width=2030&format=png&auto=webp&s=f5ac2130fa83ebf6ee61ab97d9ea54963efa5b04

Features

  • SaaS Provider for OTC and other Institutionals
  • Trustless Smart Contract Network4
  • Impersonal Orders with Proof-of-Funds from KYC Verified Members
  • Integration with third party OTC desk
  • Referral program for Agents and Deal Merge Fee Trustee
  • Onchain trustless deals initiate by manager or beneficiary
  • Cross-chain5 Trustless DLT System
4 Trustless Network is based on blockchain opportunities, the system provides manager or beneficiary to setup terms for each deal, including price, referral fee amount, choose exact whitelisted tokens for both sides of exchange, also minimum transaction volume or fix lot for change. The all details are transparent and available in blockchain comments and through the provided interface for both sides.
5 On the first stage we provide Ethereum ERC-20 based MVP which is demonstrate the concept and during the public Beta-test continue working with Bitcoin blockchain integration stability.

Two or more OTC brokers can merge any deal, set-up needed fee size and share it through built in partner program.
Time is saved for all market participants — from agreement to transfer receipt both sides could spend less than 1 hour, instead of days or weeks.
Anonymity is protected — large impersonal reliable orders and no needed meetings anymore.
As the majority of brokers execute based on Request for Quote (RFQ) and ‘Fill or Kill’ (FOK). That’s why we created four types of contracts:
  1. FOK with two participants and fix lot order.
  2. FOK with two participants and minimum order amount.
  3. One side offer can be filled with unlimited transactions from second side and minimum order amount.
  4. One side offer can be filled with unlimited transactions from second side with fix lot order.
Contracts can be declined by initiator any time before lot or minimum order amount fulfilment. If declined, all funds returns to senders without any fees. Same as escrow but trustless.

Options

ROXY provides:
  1. Web app cabinet, where broker prepare a deal in three simple steps: choosing contract type, fill up details (tokens for buyer and seller, price, lot/minimum amount, fee, other additional details) and creates contract with transparent accepted by participants terms.
  2. White label integration.
The service is provided under an agreement B2B to a companies authorised to proceed exchanges of crypto assets for their customers according to regulatory agreements in the countries where entities operating.


ROXY launch Q1, 2020 Early access is going in January
[Request for beta](mailto:[email protected])
Follow updates in telegram channel.
submitted by mrAlexRoyce to u/mrAlexRoyce [link] [comments]

Craig Steven Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto

A couple of years ago in the early months of the 2017, I published a piece called Abundance Via Cryptocurrencies (https://www.reddit.com/C\_S\_T/comments/69d12a/abundance\_via\_cryptocurrencies/) in which I kind of foresaw the crypto boom that had bitcoin go from $1k to $21k and the alt-coin economy swell up to have more than 60% of the bitcoin market capitalisation. At the time, I spoke of coming out from “the Pit” of conspiracy research and that I was a bit suss on bitcoin’s inception story. At the time I really didn’t see the scaling solution being put forward as being satisfactory and the progress on bitcoin seemed stifled by the politics of the social consensus on an open source protocol so I was looking into alt coins that I thought could perhaps improve upon the shortcomings of bitcoin. In the thread I made someone recommended to have a look at 4chan’s business and finance board. I did end up taking a look at it just as the bull market started to really surge. I found myself in a sea of anonymous posters who threw out all kinds of info and memes about the hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of different shitcoins and why they’re all going to have lambos on the moon. I got right in to it, I loved the idea of filtering through all the shitposts and finding the nuggest of truth amongst it all and was deeply immersed in it all as the price of bitcoin surged 20x and alt coins surged 5-10 times against bitcoin themselves. This meant there were many people who chucked in a few grand and bought a stash of alt coins that they thought were gonna be the next big thing and some people ended up with “portfolios” 100-1000x times their initial investment.
To explain what it’s like to be on an anonymous business and finance board populated with incel neets, nazis, capitalist shit posters, autistic geniuses and whoever the hell else was using the board for shilling their coins during a 100x run up is impossible. It’s hilarious, dark, absurd, exciting and ultimately addictive as fuck. You have this app called blockfolio that you check every couple of minutes to see the little green percentages and the neat graphs of your value in dollars or bitcoin over day, week, month or year. Despite my years in the pit researching conspiracy, and my being suss on bitcoin in general I wasn’t anywhere near as distrustful as I should have been of an anonymous business and finance board and although I do genuinely think there are good people out there who are sharing information with one another in good faith and feel very grateful to the anons that have taken their time to write up quality content to educate people they don’t know, I wasn’t really prepared for the level of organisation and sophistication of the efforts groups would go to to deceive in this space.
Over the course of my time in there I watched my portfolio grow to ridiculous numbers relative to what I put in but I could never really bring myself to sell at the top of a pump as I always felt I had done my research on a coin and wanted to hold it for a long time so why would I sell? After some time though I would read about something new or I would find out of dodgy relationships of a coin I had and would want to exit my position and then I would rebalance my portfolio in to a coin I thought was either technologically superior or didn’t have the nefarious connections to people I had come across doing conspiracy research. Because I had been right in to the conspiracy and the decentralisation tropes I guess I always carried a bit of an antiauthoritarian/anarchist bias and despite participating in a ridiculously capitalistic market, was kind of against capitalism and looking to a blockchain protocol to support something along the lines of an open source anarchosyndicalist cryptocommune. I told myself I was investing in the tech and believed in the collective endeavour of the open source project and ultimately had faith some mysterious “they” would develop a protocol that would emancipate us from this debt slavery complex.
As I became more and more aware of how to spot artificial discussion on the chans, I began to seek out further some of the radical projects like vtorrent and skycoin and I guess became a bit carried away from being amidst such ridiculous overt shilling as on the boards so that if you look in my post history you can even see me promoting some of these coins to communities I thought might be sympathetic to their use case. I didn’t see it at the time because I always thought I was holding the coins with the best tech and wanted to ride them up as an investor who believed in them, but this kind of promotion is ultimately just part of a mentality that’s pervasive to the cryptocurrency “community” that insists because it is a decentralised project you have to in a way volunteer to inform people about the coin since the more decentralised ones without premines or DAO structures don’t have marketing budgets, or don’t have marketing teams. In the guise of cultivating a community, groups form together on social media platforms like slack, discord, telegram, twitter and ‘vote’ for different proposals, donate funds to various boards/foundations that are set up to give a “roadmap” for the coins path to greatness and organise marketing efforts on places like reddit, the chans, twitter. That’s for the more grass roots ones at least, there are many that were started as a fork of another coin, or a ICO, airdrop or all these different ways of disseminating a new cryptocurrency or raising funding for promising to develop one. Imagine the operations that can be run by a team that raised millions, hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars on their ICOs, especially if they are working in conjunction with a new niche of cryptocurrency media that’s all nepotistic and incestuous.
About a year and a half ago I published another piece called “Bitcoin is about to be dethroned” (https://www.reddit.com/C\_S\_T/comments/7ewmuu/bitcoin\_is\_about\_to\_be\_dethroned/) where I felt I had come to realise the scaling debate had been corrupted by a company called Blockstream and they had been paying for social media operations in a fashion not to dissimilar to correct the record or such to control the narrative around the scaling debate and then through deceit and manipulation curated an apparent consensus around their narrative and hijacked the bitcoin name and ticker (BTC). I read the post again just before posting this and decided to refer to it to to add some kind of continuity to my story and hopefully save me writing so much out. Looking back on something you wrote is always a bit cringey especially because I can see that although I had made it a premise post, I was acting pretty confident that I was right and my tongue was acidic because of so much combating of shills on /biz/ but despite the fact I was wrong about the timing I stand by much of what I wrote then and want to expand upon it a bit more now.
The fork of the bitcoin protocol in to bitcoin core (BTC) and bitcoin cash (BCH) is the biggest value fork of the many that have occurred. There were a few others that forked off from the core chain that haven’t had any kind of attention put on them, positive or negative and I guess just keep chugging away as their own implementation. The bitcoin cash chain was supposed to be the camp that backed on chain scaling in the debate, but it turned out not everyone was entirely on board with that and some players/hashpower felt it was better to do a layer two type solution themselves although with bigger blocks servicing the second layer. Throughout what was now emerging as a debate within the BCH camp, Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre of Coin Geek said they were going to support massive on chain scaling, do a node implementation that would aim to restore bitcoin back to the 0.1.0 release which had all kinds of functionality included in it that had later been stripped by Core developers over the years and plan to bankrupt the people from Core who changed their mind on agreeing with on-chain scaling. This lead to a fork off the BCH chain in to bitcoin satoshis vision (BSV) and bitcoin cash ABC.

https://bitstagram.bitdb.network/m/raw/cbb50c322a2a89f3c627e1680a3f40d4ad3cee5a3fb153e5d6d001bdf85de404

The premise for this post is that Craig S Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. It’s an interesting premise because depending upon your frame of reference the premise may either be a fact or to some too outrageous to even believe as a premise. Yesterday it was announced via CoinGeek that Craig Steven Wright has been granted the copyright claim for both the bitcoin white-paper under the pen name Satoshi Nakamoto and the original 0.1.0 bitcoin software (both of which were marked (c) copyright of satoshi nakamoto. The reactions to the news can kind of be classified in to four different reactions. Those who heard it and rejected it, those who heard it but remained undecided, those who heard it and accepted it, and those who already believed he was. Apparently to many the price was unexpected and such a revelation wasn’t exactly priced in to the market with the price immediately pumping nearly 100% upon the news breaking. However, to some others it was a vindication of something they already believed. This is an interesting phenomena to observe. For many years now I have always occupied a somewhat positively contrarian position to the default narrative put forward to things so it’s not entirely surprising that I find myself in a camp that holds the minority opinion. As you can see in the bitcoin dethroned piece I called Craig fake satoshi, but over the last year and bit I investigated the story around Craig and came to my conclusion that I believed him to be at least a major part of a team of people who worked on the protocol I have to admit that through reading his articles, I have kind of been brought full circle to where my contrarian opinion has me becoming somewhat of an advocate for “the system’.
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/

When the news dropped, many took to social media to see what everyone was saying about it. On /biz/ a barrage of threads popped up discussing it with many celebrating and many rejecting the significance of such a copyright claim being granted. Immediately in nearly every thread there was a posting of an image of a person from twitter claiming that registering for copyright is an easy process that’s granted automatically unless challenged and so it doesn’t mean anything. This was enough for many to convince them of the insignificance of the revelation because of the comment from a person who claimed to have authority on twitter. Others chimed in to add that in fact there was a review of the copyright registration especially in high profile instances and these reviewers were satisfied with the evidence provided by Craig for the claim. At the moment Craig is being sued by Ira Kleiman for an amount of bitcoin that he believes he is entitled to because of Craig and Ira’s brother Dave working together on bitcoin. He is also engaged in suing a number of people from the cryptocurrency community for libel and defamation after they continued to use their social media/influencer positions to call him a fraud and a liar. He also has a number of patents lodged through his company nChain that are related to blockchain technologies. This has many people up in arms because in their mind Satoshi was part of a cypherpunk movement, wanted anonymity, endorsed what they believed to be an anti state and open source technologies and would use cryptography rather than court to prove his identity and would have no interest in patents.
https://bitstagram.bitdb.network/m/raw/1fce34a7004759f8db16b2ae9678e9c6db434ff2e399f59b5a537f72eff2c1a1
https://imgur.com/a/aANAsL3)

If you listen to Craig with an open mind, what cannot be denied is the man is bloody smart. Whether he is honest or not is up to you to decide, but personally I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and then cut them off if i find them to be dishonest. What I haven’t really been able to do with my investigation of craig is cut him off. There have been many moments where I disagree with what he has had to say but I don’t think people having an opinion about something that I believe to be incorrect is the same as being a dishonest person. It’s very important to distinguish the two and if you are unable to do so there is a very real risk of you projecting expectations or ideals upon someone based off your ideas of who they are. Many times if someone is telling the truth but you don’t understand it, instead of acknowledging you don’t understand it, you label them as being stupid or dishonest. I think that has happened to an extreme extent with Craig. Let’s take for example the moment when someone in the slack channel asked Craig if he had had his IQ tested and what it was. Craig replied with 179. The vast majority of people on the internet have heard someone quote their IQ before in an argument or the IQ of others and to hear someone say such a score that is actually 6 standard deviations away from the mean score (so probably something like 1/100 000) immediately makes them reject it on the grounds of probability. Craig admits that he’s not the best with people and having worked with/taught many high functioning people (sometimes on the spectrum perhaps) on complex anatomical and physiological systems I have seen some that also share the same difficulties in relating to people and reconciling their genius and understandings with more average intelligences. Before rejecting his claim outright because we don’t understand much of what he says, it would be prudent to first check is there any evidence that may lend support to his claim of a one in a million intelligence quotient.

Craig has mentioned on a number of occasions that he holds a number of different degrees and certifications in relation to law, cryptography, statistics, mathematics, economics, theology, computer science, information technology/security. I guess that does sound like something someone with an extremely high intelligence could achieve. Now I haven’t validated all of them but from a simple check on Charles Sturt’s alumni portal using his birthday of 23rd of October 1970 we can see that he does in fact have 3 Masters and a PhD from Charles Sturt. Other pictures I have seen from his office at nChain have degrees in frames on the wall and a developer published a video titled Craig Wright is a Genius with 17 degrees where he went and validated at least 8 of them I believe. He is recently publishing his Doctorate of Theology through an on-chain social media page that you have to pay a little bit for access to sections of his thesis. It’s titled the gnarled roots of creation. He has also mentioned on a number of occasions his vast industry experience as both a security contractor and business owner. An archive from his LinkedIn can be seen below as well.

LinkedIn - https://archive.is/Q66Gl
https://youtu.be/nXdkczX5mR0 - Craig Wright is a Genius with 17 Degrees
https://www.yours.org/content/gnarled-roots-of-a-creation-mythos-45e69558fae0 - Gnarled Roots of Creation.
In fact here is an on chain collection of articles and videos relating to Craig called the library of craig - https://www.bitpaste.app/tx/94b361b205196560d1bd09e4e3b3ec7ad6bea478af204cabfe243efd8fc944dd


So there is a guy with 17 degrees, a self professed one in a hundred thousand IQ, who’s worked for Australian Federal Police, ASIO, NSA, NASA, ASX. He’s been in Royal Australian Air Force, operated a number of businesses in Australia, published half a dozen academic papers on networks, cryptography, security, taught machine learning and digital forensics at a number of universities and then another few hundred short articles on medium about his work in these various domains, has filed allegedly 700 patents on blockchain related technology that he is going to release on bitcoin sv, copyrighted the name so that he may prevent other competing protocols from using the brand name, that is telling you he is the guy that invented the technology that he has a whole host of other circumstantial evidence to support that, but people won’t believe that because they saw something that a talking head on twitter posted or that a Core Developer said, or a random document that appears online with a C S Wright signature on it that lists access to an address that is actually related to Roger Ver, that’s enough to write him off as a scam. Even then when he publishes a photo of the paper copy which appears to supersede the scanned one, people still don’t readjust their positions on the matter and resort back to “all he has to do is move the coins or sign a tx”.

https://imgur.com/urJbe10

Yes Craig was on the Cypherpunk mailing list back in the day, but that doesn’t mean that he was or is an anarchist. Or that he shares the same ideas that Code Is Law that many from the crypto community like to espouse. I myself have definitely been someone to parrot the phrase myself before reading lots of Craig’s articles and trying to understand where he is coming from. What I have come to learn from listening and reading the man, is that although I might be fed up with the systems we have in place, they still exist to perform important functions within society and because of that the tools we develop to serve us have to exist within that preexisting legal and social framework in order for them to have any chance at achieving global success in replacing fiat money with the first mathematically provably scarce commodity. He says he designed bitcoin to be an immutable data ledger where everyone is forced to be honest, and economically disincentivised to perform attacks within the network because of the logs kept in a Write Once Read Many (WORM) ledger with hierarchical cryptographic keys. In doing so you eliminate 99% of cyber crime, create transparent DAO type organisations that can be audited and fully compliant with legislature that’s developed by policy that comes from direct democratic voting software. Everyone who wants anonymous coins wants to have them so they can do dishonest things, illegal things, buy drugs, launder money, avoid taxes.

Now this triggers me a fair bit as someone who has bought drugs online, who probably hasn’t paid enough tax, who has done illegal things contemplating what it means to have that kind of an evidence ledger, and contemplate a reality where there are anonymous cryptocurrencies, where massive corporations continue to be able to avoid taxes, or where methamphetamine can be sold by the tonne, or where people can be bought and sold. This is the reality of creating technologies that can enable and empower criminals. I know some criminals and regard them as very good friends, but I know there are some criminals that I do not wish to know at all. I know there are people that do horrific things in the world and I know that something that makes it easier for them is having access to funds or the ability to move money around without being detected. I know arms, drugs and people are some of the biggest markets in the world, I know there is more than $50 trillion dollars siphoned in to off shore tax havens from the value generated as the product of human creativity in the economy and how much human charity is squandered through the NGO apparatus. I could go on and on about the crappy things happening in the world but I can also imagine them getting a lot worse with an anonymous cryptocurrency. Not to say that I don’t think there shouldn’t be an anonymous cryptocurrency. If someone makes one that works, they make one that works. Maybe they get to exist for a little while as a honeypot or if they can operate outside the law successfully longer, but bitcoin itself shouldn’t be one. There should be something a level playing field for honest people to interact with sound money. And if they operate within the law, then they will have more than adequate privacy, just they will leave immutable evidence for every transaction that can be used as evidence to build a case against you committing a crime.

His claim is that all the people that are protesting the loudest about him being Satoshi are all the people that are engaged in dishonest business or that have a vested interest in there not being one singular global ledger but rather a whole myriad of alternative currencies that can be pumped and dumped against one another, have all kinds of financial instruments applied to them like futures and then have these exchanges and custodial services not doing any Know Your Customer (KYC) or Anti Money Laundering (AML) processes. Bitcoin SV was delisted by a number of exchanges recently after Craig launched legal action at some twitter crypto influencetalking heads who had continued to call him a fraud and then didn’t back down when the CEO of one of the biggest crypto exchanges told him to drop the case or he would delist his coin. The trolls of twitter all chimed in in support of those who have now been served with papers for defamation and libel and Craig even put out a bitcoin reward for a DOX on one of the people who had been particularly abusive to him on twitter. A big european exchange then conducted a twitter poll to determine whether or not BSV should be delisted as either (yes, it’s toxic or no) and when a few hundred votes were in favour of delisting it (which can be bought for a couple of bucks/100 votes). Shortly after Craig was delisted, news began to break of a US dollar stable coin called USDT potentially not being fully solvent for it’s apparent 1:1 backing of the token to dollars in the bank. Binance suffered an alleged exchange hack with 7000 BTC “stolen” and the site suspending withdrawals and deposits for a week. Binance holds 800m USDT for their US dollar markets and immediately once the deposits and withdrawals were suspended there was a massive pump for BTC in the USDT markets as people sought to exit their potentially not 1:1 backed token for bitcoin. The CEO of this exchange has the business registered out of Malta, no physical premises, the CEO stays hotel room to hotel room around the world, has all kind of trading competitions and the binance launchpad, uses an unregistered security to collect fees ($450m during the bear market) from the trading of the hundreds of coins that it lists on its exchange and has no regard for AML and KYC laws. Craig said he himself was able to create 100 gmail accounts in a day and create binance accounts with each of those gmail accounts and from the same wallet, deposit and withdraw 1 bitcoin into each of those in one day ($8000 x 100) without facing any restrictions or triggering any alerts or such.
This post could ramble on for ever and ever exposing the complexities of the rabbit hole but I wanted to offer some perspective on what’s been happening in the space. What is being built on the bitcoin SV blockchain is something that I can only partially comprehend but even from my limited understanding of what it is to become, I can see that the entirety of the crypto community is extremely threatened as it renders all the various alt coins and alt coin exchanges obsolete. It makes criminals play by the rules, it removes any power from the developer groups and turns the blockchain and the miners in to economies of scale where the blockchain acts as a serverless database, the miners provide computational resources/storage/RAM and you interact with a virtual machine through a monitor and keyboard plugged in to an ethernet port. It will be like something that takes us from a type 0 to a type 1 civilisation. There are many that like to keep us in the quagmire of corruption and criminality as it lines their pockets. Much much more can be read about the Cartel in crypto in the archive below. Is it possible this cartel has the resources to mount such a successful psychological operation on the cryptocurrency community that they manage to convince everyone that Craig is the bad guy, when he’s the only one calling for regulation, the application of the law, the storage of immutable records onchain to comply with banking secrecy laws, for Global Sound Money?

https://archive.fo/lk1lH#selection-3671.46-3671.55

Please note, where possible, images were uploaded onto the bitcoin sv blockchain through bitstagram paying about 10c a pop. If I wished I could then use an application etch and archive this post to the chain to be immutably stored. If this publishing forum was on chain too it would mean that when I do the archive the images that are in the bitstragram links (but stored in the bitcoin blockchain/database already) could be referenced in the archive by their txid so that they don’t have to be stored again and thus bringing the cost of the archive down to only the html and css.
submitted by whipnil to C_S_T [link] [comments]

Answers to the straight questions to the GV Team

Hi all! Recently we had a bunch of great questions that were asked in the Reddit, right over here: https://www.reddit.com/genesisvision/comments/bbtolk/straight_questions_to_the_gv_team_ten_so_fa
We took some time to prepare a reply and here it is!


Hello.
I am Ruslan Kamenskiy, the person responsible for the GV products in our team.
Thank you for the many questions. I will try to answer them as fully as possible, but before answering, I would like to make a small introduction so that members of the community understand more why things are happening anyway.
- Development of any project is always a series of trade-offs. Resources are always limited and the need to choose where to send them is always present. Our task is to distribute our resources optimally considering short-term missions and long-term objectives.
- We have a very active and large community. It consists of many different representatives. Everyone has their own needs, expectations, problems and pains. And often in some decisions, you need to look for a middle ground, and you can not please everyone. Investors want maximum security, minimum commissions and maximum profits. Managers want huge investments, minimum responsibility and maximum opportunities. Brokers and exchanges want maximum trading volumes from us. And many requirements of different market participants contradict each other. Therefore, we must always look for optimal solutions.
- As I said, we have a vast and active community. And as a result, we have a tremendous amount of feedback and suggestions. Every day they come to us from all channels (feedback portal, social networks, Reddit, support mail, and even private messages in telegram). Right now in our task tracker in backlog 160 feedbacks are hanging for implementation. We appreciate the feedback of our users, but unfortunately, due to limited resources, we cannot implement everything at the same time, so we prioritise requests and suggestions. It is excruciating for us to receive messages from our users stating "I suggested this a month ago, but this has not been implemented yet," but we hope for understanding. We are trying.
- Investors want the maximum possible profit with minimal risk. But this is impossible. If we go the route of the maximum of investors' safety (for example, we prohibit trading with leverage, we make maximum stop-outs, etc.), this will minimise the potential investor's profit and make the platform uninteresting for managers. We try to find the right balance between protecting investors from rogue managers and allowing investors to make informed on their decisions based on the analytical tools we provide to create transparency in the managers’ trading strategies. However, we do not believe that restricting managers too much is the best path forward for the ecosystem. We view our job as creating a fully transparent system that allows participants to make highly educated decisions => it is then up to them to take ownership of said decision.
- Almost every day we get the questions "When exactly this will be." We have internal deadlines for the implementation of various functions, but to make public statements about the exact date of the implementation of some functionality is not always the best idea, because there are many factors affecting the real state of affairs. And the delay, even for a couple of hours, is always perceived by the community as extremely negative. But we do not refuse to share information about our current work and immediate plans.
Why do you allow numerous programs by the same manager? Do you intend to curtail it to a limited number? If yes, how many? When will you implement?
Allowing managers to have several programs is necessary for the following reasons:
All information on the number and performance of all programs is public and available to investors.
Do you intend to pose restrictions on entry and success fees to prevent exploitative fees? If yes, what restrictions and when will you implement?
Restrictions on maximum fees are already present. At the same time, this information is available in the program details, which allows the investor to evaluate all the sizes of the commissions before making a decision on investing. Additionally, in order to avoid exploitative fees, the entry fee is charged only for programs that have reached level 3. All this together provides, in our opinion, a fairly transparent system of commissions, in which the investor has all the necessary information to make an educated decision. However, if you have any specific constructive suggestions for improving the system, we are always happy to listen and take them into account.
Do you intend to start adopting some form of intervention when a trader goes on downward money losing spiral? Some form of trading floor manager action after x% losses? If yes, how and when? If not, why not?
We have introduced the Stop-out functionality, just designed to limit the loss of investors. This is an industry standard solution that helps solve the problem described.
Do you intend to impose a cool-down time limit or even fee increase limit to prevent managers to close a program and immediately reopen another one? If yes, what/when will you implement?
Managers close and open new programs for various reasons, which is a normal workflow, and we do not want to artificially limit them in this. At the same time, information about the number of manager’s programs, as well as their performance, is public and available to investors for analysis. This information, in our opinion, should be sufficient to determine how honest a particular manager acts.
Do you intend to implement some form of deletion? In which way? When?
The level system is currently being analyzed and re-thought. At the same time, our community takes an active part in this process. Actual information can be obtained in our telegram (work on this is going right now).
Do you intend to return entree fees when a program that is announced for a period of X days terminates the program before the end of the period? When?
Entry fee is charged starting from 3rd level programs. This means that this is not a new program, but already having a certain history of successful trading.
However, your proposal is absolutely reasonable, and in some situations, returning an entry fee may be a fair decision. We are currently working on this issue and are considering how to improve the current situation.
Do you intend to implement a policy so that entry fees only vest if the manager makes more profit, net of success fees, than what was charged in the entry fee? When?
If you think about it, then this is quite a delicate issue, and we cannot count everything only by profit. I will give a specific example - in the first case, the investor invests 1 BTC in the Forex program, according to the results of the period, the manager does not show a substantial profit (say, he does not cover the entry fee minus the success fee), but during this time the whole crypto market has fallen by 50% (and we all know that this happens). Formally, the conditions for obtaining the entry fee you described are not met, but the manager has helped the investor save (and even multiply) his BTC holdings.
Here’s another situation - the investor invests the same 1 BTC in the ETH program, the manager shows a profit sufficient to pay the entry fee according to your policy, but due to a significant drop in the cost of the ETH, the investor is still in the red.
So who of these managers really deserves the entry fee? We believe both. Entry Fee is available to programs only from level 3, which means that the manager has successful trading experience, although even with many programs this value is set to zero. A performance-based fee is a success fee, and the entry fee, taking into account all factors, is wiser to leave unconditional, in order to observe the interests of all categories of users.
Do you intend to review the way the GVT token is used in the platform to actually create demand for the token? What are the ideas that you have recently been discussing? When are any of those ideas likely to be implemented?
Yes, we are constantly working on this issue. Some ideas have been described in recent blog posts (GVT burning, profit distribution in GVT, payment of a subscription for copying in GVT)
Nowadays, while the platform have programs with not too much capital, the amount of GVT required to get a discount does not make economic sense. Would you consider a temporary reduction in the number of GVT one needs to hold to get discounts on fees, in the same vein that Binance had very friendly reduced fees in its first year?
We have a discount for GVT holders selling on GM in the same way asBinance has discounts for holding BNB on their exchange. And you need to understand that Binance had very friendly fees during a completely different state of the crypto market. The capitalization of all cryptocurrency grew and was much easier to keep them low then it is now.
But we are working in this direction.
We already know you are planning a new level system. What are some additional concrete investor protection actions the GV team plans to implement? When can we expect them to be implemented?
The system of levels is now being revised with the participation of the community. Actual information can be obtained in our telegram (i.e., work on this is underway right now)
Will you rethink the functionality and design of the reinvestment toggle, and add clear labels so that users do not have their money tied up in funds that they do not wish to invest in? If yes, when?
The reinvest button has already been renamed to “Reinvest profit” for better understanding.
When and how will the UI be revamped (The dashboard, so it is clearer how investments are performing; More filters; Display of overall manager performance across all their programs)?
Regarding the question “how”, I can not answer shortly. For the answer, you would need to write a whole article, but you can be sure that we are constantly working on improving the UI based on your feedback. If you have been following the development of the platform for a long time, you might notice that with each major update, the UI changes significantly. This is due to the fact that Genesis Vision is a complex system with a lot of information, so it is often possible to find the right balance between informational content and convenience only through trial and error and only with the active participation of product users.
Will there be a way to withdraw everything at the next ending of a period? When/how are you going to implement this?
Yes, it is already being worked on, but we cannot point to an exact date at the moment.
Could you study a way to enable investors to withdraw invested money before the end of the reporting period, in particular if there is money not currently allocated to a trade? What is your thinking about alternative ways to implement this?
This issue is not so obvious. If you withdraw funds during the trading period, this can disrupt the manager's trading strategy. Even if these funds are now free, they can be used to maintain margins when trading with leverage. And if you take the money, then Margin Call will happen (and then Stop out) and all investors will lose money, because funds are not enough to maintain the position.
submitted by genesis-vision to genesisvision [link] [comments]

EOS deposits? The instructions are worse than useless

UPDATE -- Binance instructions are next to useless BUT I was able to get the deposit to work.
When you click the "deposit" button you will see EOS Deposit, followed by a 10 digit numbrer EOS Deposit Address, followed by "binanceleos"
when you want to deposit from an EOS wallet but the Deposit Address in the "Send to (account name)" field and put that 10 digit number (which EOS support refers to as a "tag" even though it is not labeled as a tag on the website" in the "memo" field.
Also, as always, send a small "test" transaction first.
Your instructions state
"Both a MEMO and an Address are required to successfully deposit your EOS to Binance"
But -- incredibly -- you do not explain what should go in the Memo field and what should go in the address field.
You list binancecleos as the EOS deposit address
and under EOS Deposits : *[number redacted]*
Which one goes in the memo field?
submitted by coswell to binance [link] [comments]

The FunFair Ecosystem - A Crypto Project that aligns incentives across 5 groups of stakeholders

Unlike most crypto projects where tokens were often seen primarily as a fund-raising approach, the FUN token is absolutely central to coordinating the activities of all the various parties within the FunFair ecosystem - FUN Token Holders, Players, Affiliates, Operators, Game Developers and Regulators.

For me, the FUN token is a perfect example of a project where the token has significant utility in aligning incentives across disparate stakeholders.

Below is my personal view on some of the value propositions for each of these groups:

FUN Token Holder


Player


Affiliate


Casino Operator


Game Developer


Regulator


As you can see, the value to each stakeholder is considerable - especially when compared to the current legacy technology - which is why I'm bullish that FunFair will be successful in achieving its mission of truly reinventing this industry.

This is my own personal view of the value props for each group - what do you think? Do you see other value props? Let me know and I'll add them to the list!
submitted by dwrcrypto to FunfairTech [link] [comments]

Straight questions to the GV team (ten so far).

Given the recent horror stories that happened in the GV platform, I would suggest that an official spokesperson from the platform take the time to address some issues. Please do not send a TG mod to simply provide vague answers and do damage control here. I believe the Reddit community will appreciate real, to the point, officially sanctioned answers by the GV team.
Below are the questions to you, GV team:
  1. Why do you allow numerous programs by the same manager? Do you intend to curtail it to a limited number? If yes, how many? When will you implement?
  2. Do you intend to pose restrictions on entry and success fees to prevent exploitative fees? If yes, what restrictions and when will you implement?
  3. Do you intend to start adopting some form of intervention when a trader goes on a downward money losing spiral? Some form of trading floor manager action after x% losses? If yes, how and when? If not, why not?
  4. Do you intend to impose a cool-down time limit or even fee increase limit to prevent managers to close a program and immediately reopen another one? If yes, what/when will you implement?
  5. Do you intend to implement some form of delevelling? In which way? When?
  6. Do you intend to return entree fees when a program that is announced for a period of X days terminates the program before the end of the period? When?
  7. Do you intend to implement a policy so that entry fees only vest if the manager makes more profit, net of success fees, than what was charged in the entry fee? When?
  8. Do you intend to review the way the GVT token is used in the platform to actually create demand for the token? What are the ideas that you have recently been discussing? When are any of those ideas likely to be implemented?
  9. Nowadays, while the platform have programs with not too much capital, the amount of GVT required to get a discount does not make economic sense. Would you consider a temporary reduction in the number of GVT one needs to hold to get discounts on fees, in the same vein that Binance had very friendly reduced fees in its first year?
  10. We already know you are planning a new level system. What are some additional concrete investor protection actions the GV team plans to implement? When can we expect them to be implemented?
  11. Will you rethink the functionality and design of the reinvestment toggle, and add clear labels so that users do not have their money tied up in funds that they do not wish to invest in? If yes, when?
  12. When and how will the UI be revamped (The dashboard, so it is clearer how investments are performing; More filters; Display of overall manager performance across all their)?
  13. Will there be a way to withdraw everything at the next ending of a period? When/how are you going to implement this?
  14. Could you study a way to enable investors to withdraw invested money before the end of the reporting period, in particular if there is money not currently allocated to a trade? What is your thinking about alternative ways to implement this?
To the other members of the community: Post your questions here. If I am able to, I will try to edit the original post and add your questions to the list.
Thanks in advance to the GV team and to whomever member of the community who wants to contribute with more to-the-point questions to the GV team.
submitted by Faren8 to genesisvision [link] [comments]

Trying to withdraw for 1st time from binance

I just purchased some XMR on binance and trying to withdraw to my xmr wallet (monerujo).
Binance is asking for a "label" then "address". I figured the address part out from the app, but what on earth is the "label"?
and if I did want a "payment ID" how would I do that? I have it checked off for not needing it...
anyways, I'm trying to figure out how to put money in my xmr wallet from binance xmr funds.. Just can't figure out what label is.
Can someone advise?
submitted by razorseal to Monero [link] [comments]

Withdrawing funds from Binance?

Is there currently a problem withdrawing funds from Binance? I managed to import some Ethereum without issue, then sold it for BTC, but when I tried to withdraw the BTC I was waiting over 2 hours without even receiving a transaction ID.
I cancelled the BTC withdrawal and transformed the BTC to NEO, then attempted to transfer the NEO to an ANS wallet. Now after 20 minutes the transaction is still in "Processing" and no transaction ID provided there either.
This is not proving to be a reassuring experience for my first interactions with Binance.
Edit: Appears to be fixed now!
Edit2: Okay - not so fixed...been doing more transactions today and am currently trying to withdraw BTC again - again it's coming up to 2 hours, and still no transaction ID. Sorry - but Binance is unusable if it has such long withdrawal times.
submitted by CMDR_Pete to binance [link] [comments]

FUD Slaying: A Guide on How to Force Binance to Touch Their Cold Wallets

Hello everyone,
I am writing today to slay some FUD and give better insight on how Binance secures our coins. This post is related to Genesis Vision Token (GVT), but it is relevant to many other ERC20 projects as well including OMG and VeChain.
A few days ago I saw a post on /cryptocurrency that I had an issue with:
https://np.reddit.com/CryptoCurrency/comments/83rdk4/beware_of_gvt_been_seeing_it_mentioned_a_lot/
The OP of this post was asserting that 35% of all GVT was owned by a single person. For any cryptocurrency project, centralization of coins is not viewed as a good thing. The primary concern of this is “What happens when that giant whale decides to dump?”
But he wasn’t the only one that was speculating that same wallet:
There were also posts related to VeChain and SingularDTV.
This particular wallet had been the source of FUD and hype for other projects as well, mainly because Etherscan never bothered to label it as a Binance wallet, and there was insufficient evidence to support that it did belong to Binance before today, even with their first GVT transaction coming from another wallet that held $2.9 Billion in other crypto. Thanks to the blockchain, there is now much stronger evidence to prove that this wallet does indeed belong to Binance. It is not a single mysterious whale hoarding coins. At first I thought this was going to be simple. I knew I owned more GVT than Binance had in their hot wallets so it should have been as easy as moving all my coins out and waiting for the cold wallet to refill the hot wallet. However, I ran into a few bumps along the way. In order to stay within the 100 BTC per day withdrawal limit, I had to split my withdrawals between 3 different days. Each day gave greater insight into how their hot wallet and cold storage method functioned.
The current wallets that are labeled on Etherscan are:
Binance Primary Hot Wallet
Binance Secondary Hot Wallet #1
Binance Secondary Hot Wallet #2
Binance also has some unlabeled cold wallets which include:
Binance Primary Cold Wallet
Binance Secondary Cold Wallet (The one in question) The keyword here is “unlabeled”. There may be more, but since my focus was on where GVT was being stored, I didn’t bother to track down others.
Withdrawal 1
I performed a withdrawal of 29000 GVT from Binance. Based on their wallet balance, this was going to severely drain their hot wallet, but I needed to get my coins off of the exchange anyway and was within my rights to do so.
I had waited over 6 hours for Binance to process my withdrawal, but nothing was happening. Were they going to shuffle their hot wallets around or would they touch their cold wallet?
Eventually my withdrawal was processed and their primary hot wallet was left with around 2900 GVT. A few hours after my withdrawal something unexpected happened. A swarm of deposits started flowing into Binance. Hundreds upon hundreds of transactions were flowing in at a mindboggling rate over the course of hours. Most of these transactions ranged between 8 and 70 GVT. All of this can be verified on the blockchain in the Binance Main Hot Wallet from March 13th.
Before I made my withdrawal there were around 8000 wallets that held GVT. After this there were less than 7000 wallets. Over 1000 deposits from varying addresses consecutively flowed into Binance in order to refill their hot wallet.
But this threw a wrench in my hypothesis. If Binance had this “wallet swarm” ready to refill their hot wallet when needed, then perhaps that cold wallet wasn’t theirs…
Withdrawal 2
The next day, I withdrew 31250 GVT. Soon after the withdrawal, the wallet began to refill again. This time a few hundred wallets were depositing between 7 and 10 GVT. It was strange but still interesting. After checking the number individual wallets holding GVT, I saw that it was down to 6630 and of those, only 6004 held an amount over 1 GVT. I also noticed that the number of “swarm wallets” was nearly depleted. Only a few remained and I was left wondering what would happen next.
Withdrawal 3
This was the last of my stash. I withdrew over 35,000 GVT to finally secure my coins and see what would happen when the smaller accounts were completely drained. My suspicion was proven correct.
With the swarm apparently depleted, Binance was forced to access their Cold Wallet for the first time in 42 days in order replenish their GVT reserves from the Secondary Cold Wallet in question. Over 550,000 GVT were moved from that wallet to their hot wallet, giving them more than enough GVT to fulfill my withdrawal request. The key here is that they moved the coins BEFORE they fulfilled my withdraw request. The timing was perfect. They saw my request, manually accessed their cold wallet and then processed my request. Previously they only used the swarm to refill their hot wallet after the request was completed. After that, they moved over 360,000 GVT from their primary hot wallet into their primary cold wallet (the one with billions of dollars in tokens). Overall, I was pleasantly surprised that things turned out the way they did. Part of me thought that they were simply going to refill from more swarm wallets that I may have been unaware of.
Of nearly 1550 transactions from March 13, 2018 and March 15, 2018, only 53 of those transactions after my first withdrawal were other withdrawals. Nearly 1500 transactions (Over 95%) into that wallet were deposits, and most of these depositing wallets each held around 0.04 ETH to facilitate transactions.
If you check the Binance Primary Hot Wallet blockchain prior to my first withdrawal you would only see a few GVT transactions per day. This event was unprecedented. I also noticed that a lot of these small wallets that emptied out their GVT held a few other coins as well. Most notably VeChain and OMG, along with some holding ZRX, Polymath and others.
The point to take away from this is that Binance secures your coins using more than a few large cold wallets. They also have a “Cold Wallet Swarm” where instead of 100,000 coins in a single wallet, they’ll have a few thousand wallets with varying numbers of coins, and each wallet can be ordered to deposit into the Binance hot wallet at a moment’s notice. Another thing to note is that the number of token holders for VeChain, OMG and other coins is not accurate since Binance themselves control thousands of those wallets. But then again, we don’t know how many people hold those coins solely on Binance either.
TL:DR
Binance apparently uses thousands of wallets to keep coins in semi-cold storage in addition to large cold wallets. They will not touch the large cold wallets unless there is low supply in hot wallets and depletion of these smaller wallets.
There is no GVT whale that owns 35% of the GVT supply. If your crypto appears to have a whale that has a crazy percentage of your project’s coins in one of these addresses, it is Binance.
submitted by novadaemon to genesisvision [link] [comments]

I posted this on the cryptocurrency subreddit, but I think this subreddit needs this more. So here it is, long read, but puts things in perspective.

A lost gem in a sea of Shitcoins Analyzed 7 Months after original post

This post is my analysis and reaction to globetrotter's original article titled "A lost gem in a sea of shitcoins" written 7 months ago. I will re-examine the reasons why globetrotter believed COSS was a hidden gem and whether or not those reasons hold true today. I will also examine the emergence of competitors with the same/similar fee-split models to that of COSS. Furthermore I will summarize the progress of COSS during this extended bear market and also give a glimpse of what is yet to come. Also as a disclaimer I do hold some COSS as well as Kucoin shares and Bibox tokens so take my information lightly and go out and do your own research.
.
The article by u/globetrotter_s14 can be viewed here: https://www.reddit.com/CryptoCurrency/comments/7h69xa/a_lost_gem_in_a_sea_of_shitcoins/?st=jjyhkpmr&sh=27f8b43b
.
His/her article basically proclaimed that COSS was an unknown gem floating among many other ERC20 shitcoins. My analysis of COSS 7 months after his article was posted follows below

What is COSS?

The Math

First take a second to learn about the numbers behind the COSS token (All data is acquired from coinmarketcap.com)
  • COSS currently has 118,810,622 tokens in circulation
  • The price of the coin as of this moment is approximately 0.076 USD
  • Market cap of COSS is floating around 9.5M USD
Now let's analyze these numbers compared to 7 months ago:
  • COSS had a circulating supply of around 60M tokens back then and now has approximately 120M
  • When globtroter wrote his article COSS was valued at near 10 cents. Today COSS is still valued at around that price (albeit a little under that value at the moment, Note it was valued at almost 3 USD during the peak of the last bull run)
  • COSS had a marketcap of around 5M when globtrotter wrote their article, it's current market cap sits at 9M (Although the price is similar the marketcap increased due to an increase in the circulating tokens. For those of you that don't quite understand marketcap and how it is more indicative of token value versus price please DYOR, otherwise you will end up buying Ripple thinking it can increase its price beyond the current price of BTC some day - This will never happen)

Analyzing globtrotter's Arguments For COSS:

You see that odd one there with only 5M market cap? Yeah. That’s the great buy right now. That’s the x10, x20 or even x30 that most people haven’t realized yet. That’s also the “dividend coin” you can scoop a ton of while it’s on the cheap, and make massive recurring revenue from as the exchange solidifies and evolves.
  • Globtrotter was referring to the relatively cheap price of COSS compared to several other coins (Binance/Kucoin). The cheaper a coin is the more you can grab of it and in the long run earn greater dividends. This statement still holds true.
  • This means you should buy COSS over Kucoin because at the current valuations you can potentially earn much more dividends.
  • However, the underlying risk here is in whether or not COSS will ever capture the volume levels Kucoin holds? If it gets to that volume level, then yes buying COSS cheap will be beneficial in the long run. Globtrotter argues that COSS has a greater chance to x10 or x30 (In fact it did going from 10 cents to 1$ and then to almost 3$ that's exactly x30, but at the same time Kucoin went from 40 cents to 20$ and is still holding a value of around 3$ today)
  • In my opinion Kucoin was the better buy back then based on coin value up until today. Although, I believe COSS is the better buy right now, COSS gives approximately 9% ROI through its dividends as it currently stands while Kucoin provides approximately 4% ROI through its dividends. COSS also provides several benefits (fiat, regulation, known team) as currently constructed that will be discussed later.
The team listens to the community’s feedback and takes it seriously. This is Gold. One of the first things they were criticized about was trying to do too many things at once (an exchange, a payment gateway, a full one-stop solution for crypto, etc.) and they’ve taken the community’s advice and decided to focus solely on the exchange for now and build it properly, before branching out to the rest. “Better excel at one thing and build from there, than be mediocre at multiple things at once”
  • This argument for COSS is spot on. The exchange takes community feedback very seriously (They work slowly but they do listen)
  • The community wanted a new Exchange UI, not a very good one but they delivered.
  • The community wanted modifications to that exchange UI, they made those changes. They got the community involved through beta testers, they hired community managers.
  • The community wanted a new UI for the entire website, they delivered.
  • The community wanted NEO, and guess what they delivered.
  • Now the community wants an API, and they will deliver, sooner or later.
  • What does this show us? COSS meets promises, yes they are usually late, but they do deliver. Everyone estimates dates but it's actually very difficult to meet them. I'm a software engineer in a big company and even we never meet our set deadlines, so it's highly unlikely a small organization scattered with teams around the world will meet solid deadlines.
They will be implementing a FIAT gateway sooner than later. We all know FIAT gateways are game changers.
  • This is already done, just one of the other things the COSS team promised and delivered on. Note implementing Fiat requires getting over several regulation hurdles. If you had any doubt on the legitimacy of the exchange then this is a reason to stop doubting COSS. Fiat volume has slowly increased but also dropped as this bear market continues. I expect Fiat will make a big difference for COSS if/when the next bull run starts.
The revenue split from trading fees is controlled by a DAO, meaning the COSS team cannot arbitrarily decide to change it later down the line, unlike KuCoin where the control over the fee split is centralized and they decrease it as they please. The DAO model also avoids it being labeled a security. First of all, those aren’t really “dividends” as dividends would require them to calculate income minus expenses to determine profit, and then distribute this profit to shareholders, and obviously that’s a legal nightmare. With the DAO model, you don’t get a percentage of the “profits”, you get a revenue split from the exchange fees, and it’s done by clicking a “distribute” button which makes a call to the smart contract and distributes your coins. COSS itself is not giving you anything
  • These kinds of things show COSS is planning for the future rather than the present (unlike Kucoin, Bibox and other exchanges that don't care as much about regulation). Yes it might not be worthwhile now but it could possibly be worth a lot more in the future. Just think of the Amazon approach, keep going slow and steady. COSS' CEO Rune already announced that they have enough funds to run for several years. Of course the big question here is that is it more worthwhile to buy other coins now and then buy COSS later on down the road?
  • COSS has also upgraded their token from an ERC20 to an ERC223 token. This was in order to speed up DAO calculations weekly as well as eliminate wrong wallet deposits. Now weekly dividends are available early/late Monday rather than Tuesday or Wednesday as was the case with ERC20 tokens.
In the long run, COSS aims to be more than just an exchange. Holders of the token, who currently get 50% of the exchange’s trading fees, will also get 50% of other fees charged from coss. This includes their eventual payment gateway. Merchants around the world wishing to accept crypto payments will be able to use COSS’s gateway and COSS will charge a 0.75% fee per transaction. We, as COSS holders, also get 50% of that. You believe crypto is the future and going mainstream? Well your COSS will entitle you to the revenue generated by tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of businesses accepting crypto payments via COSS Point-Of-Sale.
  • This is true as COSS has already started USD payments as part of the weekly fee split. However the USD has to be converted to ETH prior to distribution.

Analyzing globtrotter's Arguments Against COSS:

It’s ugly. The UI sucks.
It doesn’t have API’s yet, meaning there’s no bots to create liquidity, and therefore low volume.
  • This is still true they don't have an API yet, although they have stated they are in the process of testing it. We should expect it in the next few months. This is one of the major things the COSS team is being called out for on the subreddit/telegram and is being used to spread FUD.
It’s been fudded to death by KuCoin shills (and their referral links you’ve seen everywhere a month ago).
  • This is probably still true, although I don't know about this too much and wouldn't think Kucoin users need to do this as that exchange is doing significantly better than COSS at the moment in terms of volume and short term growth.
Charts are horrible
  • This is also no longer true. Charts have received a considerable update thanks to the implementation of trading view.

Rising Competition and the Transaction Mining Scam:

  • Several new competitor exchanges with similar Fee-split models have been popping up recently (FCoin, CoinEx, Coinbene, Bit-Z to name a few)
  • These exchanges are all offering an exchange coin to users as a reward for a term titled "Transaction mining".
  • Transaction mining basically works as follows: The user trades coins on the exchange and earns a split of the exchanges dividend token proportional to their trading volume.
  • Transaction mining is a brilliant idea, but there has to be a catch right? Well there is a catch, the longer the transaction mining goes on the more the exchange token is divided among users. The more coins there are the lower your dividend will be in the long run. A good example is Coinbene's exchange coin called Coni. Each coin is valued at approximately 10 cents (very similar to COSS). The difference here is that there will eventually be 1 billion CONI in circulation, that is 5x the total supply of COSS. Which means that if all other aspects were equal (Volume, cost per token) then 1 COSS token would earn 5x the dividends of a CONI token.
  • Another thing to be wary of is these exchanges not providing any firm details regarding their tokens. For example will coinbene pay CONI holders 80% dividends perpetually? (Highly doubt this is the case) These exchanges are basically taking money in the form of exchange fees and giving you their own tokens in return (i.e. doing an ICO with the ICO price being the exchange fee users are paying). Update: Coinbene's dividend program has already ended causing a massive drop in the token's price.
  • I would be extremely careful investing in these coins.

Summary of COSS' progress in last 7 months:

  • Exchange UI received significant upgrades
  • Community testers program established (COSS fixed several bugs because of this program)
  • Community managers hired to help with the massive increase in COSS' community
  • Expanded team with several hires within Singapore, this includes qualified individuals like Mong as their engineering director (Since Mong joined COSS started delivering solid upgrades to the exchange)
  • COSS token upgraded from ERC20 to ERC223 (Allows for dividends to be distributed much quicker weekly)
  • Trading promos introduced (Not very successful IMO as it caused severe wash trading on the exchange)
  • Several ICOs completed successfully on the platform
  • Received regulatory compliance from Monetory Authority of Singapore (first step to launching FIAT)
  • Advanced KYC added to prepare for Fiat deposits
  • FIAT deposits launched for BTC, ETH and COSS (USD deposits only with minimum buy in of 1000$)
  • New UI for entire website released (Major upgrade to old clunky UI, including dashboard, fee-split and various other pages)
  • FIAT pairs added for several major alts (OMG, EOS, DASH, etc)
  • Minimum fiat deposit reduced to 500$
  • COSS trading pairs added to the exchange
  • COSS partnership with BCT to allow for institutional investors to invest through COSS
  • Neo added to the exchange (Brings support for listing of tokens based on the NEO blockchain)

What's next for COSS?:

  • Currently in testing phase of API (release will likely be soon)
  • Working with BCT to capture some institutional investors in Singapore
COSS 2.0
  • A team of more than thirty developers working on COSS 2.0
  • 1.5M TPS at launch, with TPS scaling built into the engine
  • Sophisticated trading tools for all users
  • Dynamic withdrawal fees with network congestion scale
  • Quick buy function
  • Basket trading
  • Crypto dust conversion
  • Full set of public and private APIs
  • Institutional accounts
  • Training platform for traders using training tokens
  • New wallet system
  • Full customization of ICO listing and promo features.
  • Auto annual report for all traders and custom report creation available
  • Portfolio and watchlist features
  • IOS/Android apps with trading and portfolio features
  • Top pairs will be listed ( NEO/GAS, Ripple, Stellar, Cardano, etc )
  • COSS base pairs
See the full medium update regarding COSS2.0 here: https://medium.com/@coss.io/coss-io-2-0-june-11th-2018-65bf2f0402f6

The Verdict/TLDR:

  • COSS is an exchange that listens to its community. COSS has made several strides in the past 7 months and deserves a second chance for those of you that used it only once.
  • COSS has a solid token model in place (This is validated by the fact that so many shady exchanges are beginning to implement similar token models, but with much worse fundamentals than COSS' smart contract based implementation).
  • Comparing COSS to several other Cryptocurrencies shows that the COSS team is working towards a product and not just updating whitepapers here and there. To those of you that have been selling your COSS tokens at market rates because of the recent FUD, take a second to stop and think about all the things COSS has accomplished in the past 7 months. Yes volume isn't there yet, but it will be there eventually, which side will you be on when that happens?
  • In conclusion I think globtrotter was right, COSS is a hidden gem in a sea of shitcoins. It is one of the few projects that have improved in leaps and bounds during this extended bear market. Once/If the next bull run begins COSS will be ready to capitalize on the new comers. COSS stands out because it is doing things differently, it is doing things by the rules and positioning itself for the future, meanwhile other exchanges are only thinking about the short term. Imagine earning a small piece of Coinbase's revenue, this is what COSS is offering token holders today, yes it is risky but it might all be worth it in the long run.
  • Of course with all that being said COSS is still an extremely risky investment, so take my information with a grain of salt, do your own research and find those gems in this ever expanding sea of shitcoins.
submitted by blockchainguy101 to CossIO [link] [comments]

Onecoin Exchange Withdrawal Update From Corporate Seroquel (QUEtiapine) withdrawals and side effects Binance: How to Withdraw Cryptocurrency Quick & Easy ... CoinCast Ep#4: Birake White Label Exchange Founder Bogdan Talks About Exchanges, Binance, And More! Earn BTC using Telegram App

Withdraw from Binance. What does label mean? i copy my hash address but it also requires a label. What is supposed to be typed into there? or can it be anything. 15 comments. share. save hide report. 90% Upvoted. This thread is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Sort by. How to turn off the withdrawal address whitelist function 1.In order to turn off the withdrawal address whitelist function, click the button on the right side of [Address Management]. After turning off the whitelist function, your account will be able to withdraw to any withdrawal address, which may lead to greater risk. If this withdrawal was not submitted by you, please disable your account and contact our support team. 8. After the withdrawal is executed successfully, you may return to [Wallet]-[Spot Account] and click [Transaction History]. Then select [Withdraw] and the corresponding [Date] to view the relevant withdrawal. Otherwise, Binance will ask you to set up Two Factor Authentication ; Select the coin for withdrawal (e.g. BTC) Click the dropdown menu and select ‘Withdrawal Address’ Select ‘Use New Address’ You can also name your wallet in the ‘Label’ field; Fill the ‘Withdrawal Address’ field with your wallet ID; Type the amount you want to ... In the video, please provide your withdrawal records and communication records with Binance CS. You also need to appear in the video and hold the information page of your ID document, and clearly say: "Today is the year/month/day, my account is applying for withdrawal of XXX coins with XXX amount.

[index] [128] [647] [145] [515] [227] [102] [615] [506] [412] [355]

Onecoin Exchange Withdrawal Update From Corporate

binance label binance limit vs market binance ltc to xrp binance limits binance logo binance news ... binance withdrawal label binance withdrawal limit binance wallet address Binance - Withdrawal Address Management Tutorial GetOff0 _dot_com. Loading... Unsubscribe from GetOff0 _dot_com? Cancel Unsubscribe. Working... Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 88. How to buy using Binance in India Binance(To buy with BTC, ETH, USDT) - https://goo.gl/hzzfAw As Koinex is closed now here is WazirX to buy any cryptocurrency directly from PayTM/IMPS - https ... In this episode, Bogdan Mavrodin the founder and CEO of Birake white label exchange talks about exchanges, markets, Binance and decentralisation! Make sure you Subscribe NOW. Follow us on twitter ... In this video, I show you how to withdraw on Binance using the cryptocurrency Ripple (XRP) as an example. Learn step-by-step how to make a withdrawal from Bi...

#