How to add money in Binance - Quora

CipherTrace adds support for BNB and Binance Chain to trace these for potential money laundering risks

CipherTrace adds support for BNB and Binance Chain to trace these for potential money laundering risks submitted by ThrillerPodcast to thrillerpodcast [link] [comments]

CipherTrace adds support for BNB and Binance Chain to trace these for potential money laundering risks

CipherTrace adds support for BNB and Binance Chain to trace these for potential money laundering risks submitted by a36 to AllThingsCrypto [link] [comments]

Binance: ✔, Wall of Coins: ✔, Trade by Trade: ✔... Our Exchange Coordinator John M is once again raising money for another major exchange to add PIVX

Donation address: DGNe3hSAJnZwMTuCCRKEaqCKzjMvkbgNWr
Message from Discord:
Hello everyone. I have an agreement with a very big exchange and they are requesting a significant marketing fee. I cannot say who it is, just know that it's a big one. I'm raising funds again so we can be added. If anyone would like to donate to the cause, please either tag me here or pm me and I will send an address.
Prior request: https://www.reddit.com/pivx/comments/7msi7c/donation_fund_for_exchange_listing/
submitted by turtleflax to pivx [link] [comments]

How much money do you need to (hypothetically), to buy the whole order book for Bitcoin on Binance? Can you calculate this, by take the sum of the bids, add some % for invisible stop orders?

How much money do you need to (hypothetically), to buy the whole order book for Bitcoin on Binance? Can you calculate this, by take the sum of the bids, add some % for invisible stop orders?
Some Text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.
submitted by snarfi to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Chainlink analysis - my thoughts and research

Necessary Disclaimer: no rule breaking intended. No price manipulation intended. I only want to share verifiable facts/links and my analysis. If I am doing anything against the rules please let me know and I will do my best to fix it ASAP. I trade crypto, including LINK, and I am currently short on LINK. This is not financial advice; this is just for my own record and to start a discussion for anyone who might want more transparency around LINK.

TL;DR:

I believe there is a lot of misinformation, uncertainty, and unanswered questions about the LINK token, the Chainlink ecosystem, the SmartContract parent company. I also believe that LINK's current price is unjustified based on fundamental factors like usage/business case/current customers/future potential. So I'm raising some points and asking some questions.
What is this post? Why should I care? How do I use it?
Read or skim it. It's about the LINK token, the Chainlink ecosystem, and the parent company SmartContract. It's about why I believe the price of the LINK token may be currently driven mostly by hype and not backed by standard market fundamentals like usage/economics.
Update 9 AUG: reorganizing, rewriting this post and moving supporting data/sources into "appendix" comments below on this post. The previous versions of this post and my comments elsewhere were too emotionally charged and caused more division rather than honest, evidence-based, productive discussion and I sincerely apologize for that. I have now rewritten it and will continue to update it.

PARTNERSHIPS

Who has Chainlink partnered with? Who is using Chainlink's technology and network? Who is contributing to developing Chainlink?
Google - this is the pinned tweet on Chainlink's official page. Nothing there about Google using Chainlink services or co-developing with them. Just that blockchains/oracles CAN use google cloud services (APIs?). This is Google Cloud's June 13, 2019 blog post: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud
Oracle - (TODO. This seems to have potential as some product manager at Oracle has posted that chainlink integration is coming Q3/Q4 of 2020)
SWIFT - the best they've got is a 30 second video with NOBODY from SWIFT present, with a *hypothetical* use case using SWIFT API.
Intel This is the only google result for "chainlink site:intel.com", and it casually mentions that Intel's TEE (trusted execution environment) technology can be used to improve the security of oracles/blockchains. Nothing about Intel themselves using or developing with Chainlink. https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/new-confidential-computing-solutions-emerge-on-the-hyperledger-avalon-trusted-compute.html
Another 240+ claimed project integrations:
[TODO] There are so many to keep track of. Every week or even more frequent is yet another integration *announcement*
Current DeFi usage: we've heard that Chainlink "secures" $1 billion in DeFi. But that's not in value locked: https://defipulse.com/ (LINK doesn't even appear on that list). That's just with DeFi data supposedly being priced using Chainlink nodes.
EG Synthetix:
https://blog.synthetix.io/chainlink-decentralizes-first-wave-of-synthetix-price-feeds/ yet where does Synthetix actually PAY to use an oracle? Not visible on-chain, maybe someone will find it.
https://defipulse.com/blog/3-defi-dapps-starting-2020-off-strong/ "... Chainlink's following includes partnerships big and small, including Intel and Google Cloud services" example of misleading/exaggerated partnership claims being circulated.

Chainlink's ROADMAP

Threshold signatures, staking, on-chain SLAs:
How real are these, is there a roadmap, how will this benefit users, is there any evidence of users currently *wanting* to use chainlink but needing these features and actively waiting for Chainlink to launch these?
Staking: for there to be a valid incentive for users to stake LINK, it has to return around 5% annually because anything substantially under that would have users putting their money elsewhere (https://www.stakingrewards.com/cryptoassets) (not counting speculative capital gains in terms of LINK's price, but price gain per token/coin applies to all other crypto projects as well).
Currently, for stakable cryptos, around 30-80% of their total supply is staked, and a good adjusted reward is on the order of 5% as well (some actually negative, some 10%+). The promise of staking incentivises people to buy and hold more LINK tokens (again, many other crypto projects have staking already live). That 5% reward will ultimately have to come from the customers who pay Chainlink oracle nodes to use their services, so it's an extra 5% fee for them. Of course, in the near future, the staking rewards *could* be subsidized by the founders' reserve wallets.
Threshold signatures: addressed below in a comment.
On-chain SLAs: [TODO]
Here's supposedly Chainlink's agile/project planning board. (TODO: verify that it is indeed Chainlink's, and then analyse it)
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823

LINK wallet addresses

As LINK is an ERC20 token on the Ethereum blockchain, all its movements are visible, all the way from the genesis creation of 1,000,000,000 LINK tokens through to aggregator nodes through to cashing out on exchanges. Below are some examples and some reasons why this may be concerning to investors/holders of LINK.
This is one LINK address whale with over 6 million LINK. Looks like some of the funds end up on a Turkish exchange Paribu. https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xc6bed363b30df7f35b601a5547fe56cd31ec63da This wallet has moved out >200,000 LINK in the last 24 hours. Don't know where, go trace it.
Typical data provider example. Lots of named Chainlink oracle nodes pay this address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x72f3dff4cd17816604dd2df6c2741e739484ca62 Usually 0.16 LINK to this address every few minutes, sometimes 2 LINK. This data provider has sent out ~11,620 LINK out to the following wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xa5d0084a766203b463b3164dfc49d91509c12dab That wallet has cashed out 9,560 LINK to 1inch.exchange (a DEX) over the past year. Has also transferred 6000 LINK to a currently loaded wallet (possibly exchange account ready to sell?): https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x088d50c0bb5381a1205d1182cc21496c6fdc4c62 Another destination accumulation wallet (~493,000 LINK with no out transfers yet) https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x7758e507850da48cd47df1fb5f875c23e3340c50 (unrelated but a sell order of this size would drop LINK's price by 10-30% on Binance, someone check my maths on this) Now tracing back who funds the 0x72f3... data provider, we see a number of named Chainlink Aggregator nodes. Picking one at random, say the TUSD/ETH one: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x73ead35fd6a572ef763b13be65a9db96f7643577 It was last funded March 12 2020 with 5000 LINK. Tracing back the funds we ultimately come to the genesis wallet of the Chainlink network itself, the original source of the 1,000,000,000 LINK tokens in existence. (side note: some interesting-looking transactions there) This is the first child of the genesis wallet that received 100,000,000 from the genesis wallet. https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0xf37c348b7d19b17b29cd5cfa64cfa48e2d6eb8db Last time this wallet transferred out was YESTERDAY for 500,000 LINK. Now this doesn't prove anything, DYOR, but to me it looks like the genesis wallets are slowly cashing out through the aggregator nodes, making it look like the oracle node network is being actively used (which it is, but it's not the end customers like AAVE/NEXO paying the LINK required to power oracles, it's SmartContract itself). I know that this is just ONE aggregator node, but I've seen the same behaviour from their other named nodes - go check for yourselves.
If you trace chainlink oracle funds to their source, you can find some of the original addresses. Some of these early on (around 1000 days ago) were linked to AfroDex labs, which looks like now doesn’t work. http://afrodex.net/#!/trade/AfroX-ETH
Who currently pays Chainlink nodes?
How much of the revenue that Chainlink nodes receive is from potentially third party customers vs internal funding by the Chainlink team wallets?
For example, this is the "Chainlink: LINK / USD Aggregator" wallet.
It has had a total 8,200 LINK deposited from 5 transactions in round amounts (on any of the below links, click the "Analytics" tab to see In/Out balance history), and has so far paid out ~5,156 LINK.
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x32dbd3214ac75223e27e575c53944307914f7a90
It typically pays ~10 wallets 0.16 Link each, a few times an hour, like so:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x02c595981b935a57cfbe6170656181faac9a16d7a33a123930a716c4abec615a ($45 in ETH fees to transfer $22 worth of LINK, sounds like a lot of overheads)
Where does this aggregator wallet get its LINK funding from?
From ONLY here: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x27158157136384c713bc09a0a7ae81c8391d7f11 (current net balance ~50,000 LINK, total ~5,000,000 million in and out)
Which in turn gets it from ONLY these three, in HUGE amounts:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xf37c348b7d19b17b29cd5cfa64cfa48e2d6eb8db (6,000,000 LINK)
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xaf40738c6f940519516e043f924b8d05fc0292b8 (just a jump address into the one above, only 3 total tx)
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x1f9e26f1c050b5c018ab0e66fcae8e4394eb0165 (147,000 LINK)
the 0x1f9e2... one got its funding from:
  1. 6098.8 LINK from Binance about a year ago: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x161cdd891e04a77e0458a3ef65c563c4d2064cd6
  2. 12,600,000 from the genesis wallet through one jump address https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f
  3. 13,000,000 from the 0xf37... wallet above
the 0xf37... in turn got its 50,000,000 (!) LINK from the genesis address which minted the original 1 billion tokens:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xf55037738604fddfc4043d12f25124e94d7d1780
So the 0x27158... wallet is basically a genesis wallet.
Now let's do the most popular feed on feeds.chain.link, the ETH/USD feed: https://feeds.chain.link/eth-usd, with a wallet address of: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xF79D6aFBb6dA890132F9D7c355e3015f15F3406F#tokenAnalytics
It was first funded in Jan 2020 and has been funded a total of 9 times for a total influx of 108,437.533 LINK, by:
  1. "Chainlink: Deployer" 10 LINK: https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x6f61507f902e1c22bcd7aa2c0452cd2212009b61
  2. The 0x27158... genesis-sourced wallet, 20,000 LINK
  3. An intermediary/middle very active wallet (which is 99.998% funded by the 0x27158... genesis-sourced wallet), 52,000 LINK https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x2f0acb9c5dd2a3511bc1d9d67258e5c9434ba569
  4. "Chainlink: Aggregator", 36,427.533 LINK, https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x79febf6b9f76853edbcbc913e6aae8232cfb9de9#tokenAnalytics
I manually traced EVERY single inbound transaction/source of funds for the above 4 (not counting #1 as 10 LINK is negligible). 2 & 3 are 99.99%+ genesis-funded, being ACTIVELY topped up by a genesis wallet, last tx 4 days ago, 500,000 LINK. #4 has been funded 36 times over the past year and a half (that's 36 manual exports and I did them all). They all come from the 0x27158..., 0x2f0acb..., and https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x1f9e26f1c050b5c018ab0e66fcae8e4394eb0165 (another address like the 0x2f0acb that I went through and checked EVERY SINGLE inbound source of funds, and it's also >99.9% genesis-funded - one tx from Binance for 6098 LINK out of a total ~6,560,000 inbound LINK from genesis wallets), and two other addresses linked to Binance (0x1b185c8611d157a67d9a9d5261b0d2bd52c0bb78, 10,000 LINK and 0x039ac18afe298747c51c85e7c8f0d67c327f3883, 1,000,000 LINK)
The 0x039ac... address funded the "Chainlink: Aggregator" address with 127,900 LINK, and the 0x1b185... with about ~9,600 LINK). So yes, it's technically possible that someone not related to Chainlink paid for the ETH / USD price feed because some funds do come from Binance. However, they only come from two distinct addresses. Surely for "240+" claimed partnerships, more than TWO would pay to use Chainlink's MOST POPULAR price feed? That is, unless they don't pay directly but to another address and then Chainlink covers this one from their own wallets. I will check if that's in line with Chainlink's whitepaper, but doesn't that throw doubt on the whole model of end-users paying to use oracles/aggregators, even if it's subsidized?
I provide you this much detail not to bore you but to show you that I went through BY HAND and checked every single source (detailed sources in Appendix B) of funds for the OFFICIAL, Chainlink-listed "ETH/USD" aggregator that's supposedly sponsored by 10 DeFi partners (Synthetix, LoopSpring, OpenLaw, 1inch, ParaSwap, MCDEX, FuturesSwap, DMM, Aave, The Force Protocol). Yet where are the transactions showing that those 10 partners have EVER paid for this ETH/USD oracle? Perhaps the data is there so what am I missing? This ETH/USD aggregator has transferred out ~76,000 LINK to I guess the data providers in increments of .33 LINK. It has 21 data providers responding. I will begin investigating the data providers themselves soon.
And those middle addresses like 0x1f9e26... and 0x2f0acb...? They have transferred out hundreds of thousands if not millions of LINK to exchanges. And that's just ONE price pair aggregator. Chainlink has around 40 of these (albeit this one's one of the more popular ones).

SNX / ETH aggregator is funded 100% by genesis-sourced wallets, only 3 inbound transactions:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xe23d1142de4e83c08bb048bcab54d50907390828

Some random examples (for later, ignore these for now) ***********
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x039ac18afe298747c51c85e7c8f0d67c327f3883 bought 1,000,000 LINK from Binance in Sept 12 & 15, 2019. (one of the possible funding sources for the ETH / USD aggregator example above)
This address got 500,000 LINK from 0x27158... and has distributed them into ~5-10,000 LINK wallets that haven't had any out transactions yet
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x5bcf3edc0bb7119e35f322ba40793b99d4620f1e
**************
Another example with an unnamed aggregator-node-like wallet that was only spun up 5 days ago, Aug 5:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x2cbfd29947f774b8cf338f776915e6fee052f236
It was funded 2,000 LINK SOLELY by the 0x27158... wallet and has so far paid out ~500 LINK in 0.43 LINK amounts to 9 wallets at a time. For example, this is one of the wallets it cashes out to:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x64fe692be4b42f4ac9d4617ab824e088350c11c2#tokenAnalytics
That wallet extremely consistently collects small amounts of LINK since Oct 2019. It must be a data provider because a lot of Chainlink named wallets pay it small amounts of LINK regularly. It has transferred out 20 times. The most recent transfer out:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xc8c30fa803833dd1fd6dbcdd91ed0b301eff87cf which then immediately transferred to the named "1inch.exchange" wallet, so I assume this was a "cash-out" transaction. It has cashed out via this address a lot.
Granted, it also has transfer-out transactions that haven't (yet) ended up in an exchange wallet, eg https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x88e5353a73f38f25a9611e6083de6f361f9b537b with a current balance of 3000 LINK. This could be a user's exchange wallet, ready to be sold, or could be something else. No way for me to tell as there are no out txs from it.

LINK overall transaction, volume, and tx fees

This is to understand how much $ moves through the LINK ecosystem through: nodes, data providers, reserve wallets, wallets linked to exchanges, others.
A typical aggregator node tx (payout?): https://etherscan.io/tx/0xef9e8e6dd94ebe9bbac8866f18c2ea0a07408ced1aa77fa04826043eaa55e772 This is their ETH/USD aggregator paying out 1 LINK to each of 21 addresses. Value of 21 LINK ~= $210. Total eth tx fees: .233 ETH (~$88.5, ~42% of the total tx value. If LINK was $4.2 instead of $10, the tx fees would be 100% of the value of the tx). Transactions like this happen every few minutes, and the payout amounts are most often 0.16, 0.66, 1.0, and 2.0 Link.
Chainlink’s node/job listing site, https://market.link, lists 86 nodes, 195 feeds, 801 jobs, ~1,080,000 job runs (I can’t tell if this is over the past 2 months or 1.5 years). Only 20 nodes have over 1000 job runs, and 62 nodes have ZERO runs. Usual job cost is listed as 0.1 link, but the overall payout to the nodes is 10-20 times this. The nodes then cash out usually through a few jump addresses to exchanges. Some quick maths: (being generous and assuming it’s 1mil jobs every 2 months = ~6mil link/year = $60,000,000 revenue a year. This is the most generous estimate towards link’s valuation I’ve found so far. If we ignore the below examples where on multi-node payouts the tx fees are more than the node revenue itself, then it’s almost in line with an over-valued (but real) big tech company.
For example, one of the latest CHF/USD job runs paid 0.1 LINK to 9 addresses (data providers?) - total $14.4 payout - and paid 0.065 ETH ($24.5) in fees. That’s a $10.1 LOSS on a $14.4 revenue: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa6351bab810b6864bfebb0f6e1e3bde3c8856f8aac3ba769dd2e6d1a39c0d23f
Linkpool’s (one of the biggest node operators) “ETH-USD CryptoCompare” job costs 0.1 link and has 33 runs in the past 24 hours (once every ~44min), total ~78,000 runs since May 30 2019 (once every ~8min). https://market.link/jobs/64bb0845-c4e1-4681-8853-0b5aa7366101/runs (PS cryptocompare has a free API that does this. Not sure why it costs $1 at current link prices to access an API once)

Token distribution:

Top 100 wallets (0.05% of ~186,000 total) hold 83% of tokens. 8 wallets each hold over 1% of total, 58 hold over 0.1%. Of these 58, 9 are named exchange/lending pool wallets.
For comparison, for Tether (TUSD), the top 100 wallets (0.006% of ~1,651,000 total) hold 35.9% of the supply. 3 addresses hold over 1% of the supply and 135 hold over 0.1%. Of these 135, at least 15 are named exchange/lending pool wallets.
LINK’s market cap is $3.5B (or $10B fully diluted, if we count the foundedev-controlled tokens, which we should as there's nothing preventing them from being moved at a moment's notice). Tether’s is $6.9B. Tether has 10 times more addresses and less distribution inequality. Both LINK and Tether are ERC20 tokens, and even if we temporarily ignore any arguments related to management/roadmap/teams etc, Tether has a clear, currently functional, single use case: keep 1 USDT = $1 USD by printing/burning USDT (and yet as of April 2019, only 74% of Tether's market cap is backed by real funds - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tether_(cryptocurrency))). Given that Chainlink's market cap is now 50% bigger than Tether's, surely by now there's AT LEAST one clear, currently functional use case for LINK? What is it? Can we *see* it happening on-chain?

Chainlink’s actual deliverable products

"What do I currently get for my money if I buy LINK 1) as an investor and 2) as a tech business/startup thinking of using oracles?”
Codebase (Chainlink’s github has around 140-200,000 lines of code (not counting html/css). What else is not counted in this? Town crier? Proprietary code that we don't know about yet? How much CODING has Chainlink done other than what's on github?
Current network of oracles - only ~20 active nodes - are there many more than the ones listed on market.link and reputation.link? If so, would be nice to know about these if we're allowed!
Documentation - they have what seems like detailed instructions on how to launch and use oracle nodes (and much more, I haven't investigated yet) (TODO this part more - what else do they offer to me as an end consumer, and eg as a tech startup needing oracle services that I can’t code myself?)

Network utilization statistics:

Etherscan.io allows csv export of the first 5000 txs from each day. From Jul 31 to Aug 6 2020, I thus downloaded 30,000 tx from midnight every day to an average of 7:10am (so 24 hour totals are 3.34x these numbers if we assume the same network utilization throughout the day).
(Summary of all LINK token activity on the ETH blockchain from 31.07 to 06.08, first 5000 txs of each day (30k total) shown Appendix A comment below this post.)
If we GENEROUSLY assume that EVERY SINGLE transaction under 10.0 LINK is ACTUAL chainlink nodes doing ACTUAL work, that’s still under 0.1% of the LINK network’s total volume being used for ACTUAL ecosystem functioning. The rest is speculation, trading, node funding by foundedev wallets, or dumping to exchanges (anything I missed?)
Assuming the above, the entire turnover of the actual LINK network is currently (18,422 LINK) * ($10/LINK) * (3.34 as etherscan.io’s data only gives first 5000 tx per day which averages to 7:10am) * (52 wk/year) = USD $31,995,329 turnover a year.
Note: the below paragraph is old analysis using traditional stock market Price/Earnings ratios which several users have now pointed out isn't really applicable in crypto. I leave it for the record. Assuming all of that is profit (which it’s not given tx fees at the very least), LINK would need a PE ratio (Price/Earnings) of 100 times to justify its current (undiluted) valuation of $3.5 billion of 300 if you count the other 65% of tokens that haven’t been dumped by the founders/devs yet. For comparison, common PE ratios are 32 (facebook), 29 (google), 37 (uber), 20 (twitter on a good year), 10 (good hedge fund returning 10% annual).

Thoughts on DeFi & yield-farming - [TODO]

Why would exchanges who do their due diligence list LINK, let alone at a leverage? 1) that's their business, they take a cut of every transaction, overhyped or not, 2) they're not safe from listing openly bearish tokens like EIDOS (troll token that incentivized users to make FAKE transactions, response to EOS) https://www.coindesk.com/defi-yield-farming-comp-token-explained
The current ANNUAL yield on liquidity/yield farming is something like 2% on STABLE tokens like USDC and TETHER which at least have most of their supply backed by real-world assets. If Chainlink LINK staking is to be successful, they'll have to achieve at LEAST that same 2% at end-state. IF LINK is in bubble territory and drops, that's a lot of years at 2% waiting to recoup losses.

SmartContract Team & Past Projects

Normally I don't like focussing on people because it leads too easily to ad-hominem attacks on personality rather than on technology/numbers as I've done above, but I came across this and didn't like what I saw.
Steve Ellis, SmartContract's current CTO, co-founded and worked in "Secure Asset Exchange" from 2014 to 2016. They developed the NXT blockchain, issued 1,000,000,000 NXT tokens (remind you of anything?), NXT was listed end of 2013 and saw 3 quick 500%-1000% pumps and subsequent dumps in early in mid 2014, and then declined to . SecureAE officially shut down in Jan 2016. Then at some point a company called Jelurida acquired the rights to NXT (presumably after SecureAE?), then during the 2017 altcoin craze NXT pumped 300 times to a market cap of $1.8 BILLION and then dumped back down 100 times and now it's a dead project with a market cap of $13 million.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steveellis0606/
https://trade.secureae.com/
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nxt/
https://www.jelurida.com/news/lawsuit-against-apollo-license-violations
As an investor or business owner, would you invest/hire a company whose co-founders/CTO's last project was a total flop with a price history chart that's textbook pump-and-dump behaviour? (and in this case, we KNOW the end result - 99% losses for investors) If you're Google/Oracle/SWIFT/Intel, would you partner with them?

Open questions for the Chainlink community and investors:

  1. Network activity: Are there any other currently active chainlink nodes other than those listed on market.link and reputation.link? If so, is there a list of them with usage statistics? Do they use some other token than LINK and thus making simple analytics of the LINK ERC20 token not an accurate representation of Chainlink’s actual activity? If the nodes listed on the two sites above ARE currently the main nodes, then
  2. PR, partnership announcements: Why is the google tweet still pinned to the top of Chainlink’s twitter? Due to the frequently circulated Chainlink promotion material (https://chainlinkecosystem.com/) that lists Google as one of the key partners, this tweet being pinned is potentially misleading as there isn't anything in there to merit calling Google a "collaborator" or "partner" - just that blockchains/oracles *can* use Google's APIs (but so can most software in the world). Is there something else going on with the SmartContract-Google relationship that warrants calling Google a partner that we're simply not aware of yet?
  3. By buying LINK, what backs YOUR money: If you have bought and currently hold LINK tokens, how comfortable are you that the future promise of your investment growing is supported on verifiable business and technological grounds versus pure, parabolic hype? If after reading this post you still are, I kindly ask you to reply and show how even one of the points I provided is either incorrect or not applicable, and I will edit my post and include your feedback in the relevant section as I have already done from other users.
  4. What have I missed? Of course not 100% of what I've said is infallible truth. I am a real human, and I have plenty of biases and blind spots. Even if what I've provided is technically correct, there may be other much more important info that I've missed that eclipses what I've provided here. Ask yourself: if the current hype around LINK is indeed valid and points to a $100/$1000 future LINK price, then Where’s Chainlink’s missing financial/performance/usage evidence to justify LINK’s current valuation of $10+?

Conclusion

For your consideration, I have provided evidence with links that you can follow and verify, and draw your own conclusions. I have made my case as to why I believe the LINK token is currently priced much higher than evidence supports, and I ask you to peer-review my analysis and share your thoughts with me and with the wider LINK/crypto community.
Thank you for your time, I realize this is a long post. All questions and feedback welcome, feel free to comment or PM. I won't delete/censoblock (except for personal threats, safety considerations etc). I am a real human but I am not revealing my true identity for obvious privacy/harassment reasons.
(If anyone is wondering about my credentials ability to add 2+2 and work with basic spreadsheets: I have previously won a math competition in a USA state, I won an English-speaking country's physics olympiad, my university education is in mathematical physics/optimization engineering, and I worked for a few years in a global manufacturing company doing data analytics, obviously I'm not posting my CV here to verify that but I promise you it's the truth)
I’m not looking to spread neither FUD, nor blind faith, nor pure hype, and I want an honest transparent objective discussion. I personally believe more that LINK is overvalued, but my beliefs have evolved and may continue to do so as I research more and understand more about Chainlink, LINK, Ethereum, DeFi, and other related topics, and as I incorporate YOUR feedback. If you think I haven't disclosed something, ask.
As always, this is not financial advice and I am not liable for anything that may happen as a result of you reading this!
submitted by Stratocatter to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Coinbase REPV2 Incident Update 8/24

First off, in terms of Coinbase wallets, I personally only use the Coinbase mobile app. If you use Coinbase Pro, or anything other than the app, you may have a different wallet or circumstances. I’m not sure how my wallet even works compared to Pro.
Although they’re scripted and not truly tailored to my questions and concerns, Coinbase Support has honestly been moderately quick with their reply emails. Latest email response (received today) included this... “Coinbase is unable to retrieve this cryptocurrency because we don't currently support it.” ..... “While there is nothing Coinbase can do to recover these funds for you at this time, if Coinbase ever decides to add this asset to our platform, please reach back out to see if we're able to credit these funds to your account.”
What I personally think is happening, and I could be very wrong, is we sent REPV2 to our REP wallets, which are ERC-20 wallets so the transfer was actually successful. Our REPV2, IS in our Coinbase provided REP addresses/wallets, as proven by EtherScan. But, Coinbase’s platform is not programmed to show us the value of our REPV2 since they have not integrated support for it yet. I believe and hope that when they “add support” for REPV2 send/receive from the “newly added” REPV2 wallet, it will then have been integrated to show the value of the REPV2 in the wallet.
Also I noticed that CB says on their website about the REPV2 migration, they will no longer support the original REP “after it is deprecated in late October”. So by late October they must have support for REPV2...? Very unclear, but unfortunately I would be prepared to not see your funds for the next 2 months if they soak up every last minute of not pushing this poorly executed migration/integration.
As far as getting our funds back in the meantime, I don’t think it’s going to happen, as I believe CB mitigates all liability and risk of fondling our money by simply not touching it. Imagine they send it back to you but really they pass the problem along by sending it back to Binance’s hot wallet for example. If they have it, and could have access to it after integration, than so be it I guess. Call it a forced HODL. We can only hope the new bull market pulls Augur up with it, and the money becomes accessible again.
Let me know what you guys think.
submitted by BTCkingpin to Augur [link] [comments]

Decentr ($DEC) - foundational cross-chain and cross-platform DeFi protocol

  1. SUMMARY
Decentr is a protocol designed to make blockchain/DLT mainstream by allowing DeFi applications built on various blockchains to “talk to each other”. Decentr is a 100% secure and decentralised Web 3.0 protocol where users can apply PDV (personal data value) to increase APR on $DEC that users loan out as part of of our DeFi dLoan features, as well as it being applied at PoS when paying for stuff online. Decentr is also building a BAT competitor browser and Chrome/Firefox extension that acts as a gateway to 100% decentralised Web 3.0
Allows DeFi Dapps to access all Decentr’s dFintech features, including dLoan, dPay. Key innovation is that the protocols is based on a user’s ability to leverage the value of their data as exchangeable “currency”.
  1. KEY CONCEPTS

  1. REVENUE MODEL
A fee is charged for every transaction using dPay whereby an exchange takes place between money (fiat and digital) and data, and vice versa, either as part of DeFi features or via a dApp built on Decentr. They are launching pilot programmes in the following industries:
  1. Banking/PSP Industry: On Product launch, due to Decentr’s powerful PSP connections (including the worlds #2 PSP by volume), a medium-scale pilot program will be launched, which will seed the network with 150,000 PSP customers in primarily the Spanish/LAC markets, generating revenue from day one.
  2. “Bricks and Mortar” Supermarket/Grocery Industry: Decentr aims to ensure the long-term competitiveness of “bricks and mortar” supermarkets against online-only grocery retailers, such as Amazon, by a) building secure tech that allows supermarkets to digitise every aspect of their supply chains and operational functions, while b) allowing supermarkets to leverage this incredibly valuable data as a liquid asset class. Expected revenue by Year 5: $114Mn per year.
  3. Online Advertising Industry: Decentr’s 100% decentralised platform credits users secure data with payable value, in the form of PDV, for engaging with ads. The Brave browser was launched in 2012 and in 8 years has reached over 12 million monthly active users, accented by as many as 4.3 million daily active users.
  4. TOKEN $DEC AND SALE
Decentr recently complete their token sale on a purchase portal powered by Dolomite where they raised $974,000 in 10 minutes for a total sale hardcap of 1.25M. The $DEC token is actively trading on multiple exchanges including Uniswap and IDEX. Listed for free on IDEX, Hotbit, Hoo, Coinw, Tidex, BKex. Listed on CoinGecko and Coinmarketcap. Listed on Delta and Blockfolio apps.
➡️ Circulating supply: 61m $DEC.
➡️ Release schedule and token distribution LINK -> NO RELEASE UNTIL 2021.
➡️Contract Address - 0x30f271C9E86D2B7d00a6376Cd96A1cFBD5F0b9b3
➡️Decimals - 18, Ticker - DEC
➡️Uniswap link: https://uniswap.info/pai0x3AEEE5bA053eF8406420DbC5801fC95eC57b0E0A
⭐️ HOW TO BUY VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iloAiv2oCRc&feature=youtu.be
$DEC Token utility:
A tradeable unit of value that is both internal and external to the Decentr platform.A unit of conversion between fiat entering and exiting the Decentr ecosystem.A way to capture the value of user data and combines the activity of every participant of the platform performing payment (dPay), or lending and borrowing (dLend), i.e a way to peg PDV to tangible/actionable value.Method of payment in the Decentr ecosystem.A method to internally underwrite the “Deconomy.
  1. NOTABLE SUPPORTERS
Simon Dedic - chief of Blockfyre: https://twitter.com/scoinaldo/status/1283787644221218817?s=20https://twitter.com/scoinaldo/status/1283719917657894912?s=21
Spectre Group Pick : https://twitter.com/SPECTREGRP/status/1284761576873041920https://twitter.com/llluckyl/status/1283765481716015111?s=21
Patrons of the Moon/Lil Uzi: https://t.me/patronsofthemoon/6764
CryptoGems: https://twitter.com/cryptogems_com/status/1283719318379925506?s=09t
tehMoonwalker pick who is a TOP 5 influencer per Binance:https://twitter.com/tehMoonwalkestatus/1284123961996050432?s=20https://twitter.com/binance/status/1279049822113198080
Holochain was one of their earliest supporters and they share a deep connection (recently an AMA was conducted in their TG group): https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/decentr-holochain-ama-29d662caed03
  1. UPCOMING NEWS
--------------------------------------------
  1. RESOURCES:
Website: https://decentr.net
Telegram: https://t.me/DecentrNet
Medium: https://medium.com/@DecentrNet
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DecentrNet
Whitepaper: https://decentr.net/files/Decentr_Whitepaper_V1.4.pdf
Technical Whitepaper: https://decentr.net/files/Decentr_Technical_Whitepaper_Data_As_Economic_Currency.pdf
Recent Articles:
⚡️- https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/decentr-token-sale-metrics-and-distribution-483bb3c58d05
⚡️- https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/how-decentrs-defi-dloan-function-benefits-dec-holders-97ff64a0c105
⚡️- https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/3-vertical-revenue-streams-decentr-is-targeting-4fa1f3dd62de
⚡️- https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/brave-browser-the-good-the-bad-and-the-fundamentally-misguided-8a8593b0ff5b
⚡️- https://medium.com/@DecentrNet/how-decentrs-dfintech-replaces-swift-sct-inst-clearing-house-and-other-payment-solutions-78acacbb4c3f
Chad Gang STRONG Community: https://t.me/decentrtrading
Community News Channel: https://t.me/chadnews
Recent Uniswap trades: https://t.me/dectrades
Wallet holder tracker: https://t.me/DEC_WALLETS_COUNT
submitted by ldd999 to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

Why VIDT is still a moonshot

Hi, let me start by recognizing the following:

With that out of the way, I will try to briefly summarize why I (long time holder, DCA'd to the bottom, no intention of selling any time soon) believe this has a strong chance to become a Top 25 token, and why that push is already underway.

  1. USP (basically the elevator pitch): VIDT validates and secures files/data on the blockchain, and does so via an easy to implement API solution. Businesses get the security and and immutability of blockchain without needing to dedicate tremendous time and resources for implementation. That's it. That's the elevator pitch. You can protect and verify data, invoices, files, certificates, etc. At first, it isn't the sexiest thing, because it isn't a chain itself, so there is no talk of ridiculous transaction speeds or unique consensus mechanisms, no technical jargon. But ask yourself: isn't that stuff antithetical to what blockchain really is about? Which leads to the second point.
  2. The beauty is in the simple, elegant service. Due to the nature of what is offered, the oft-discussed pitfalls holding blockchain back from "mass adoption" are far less relevant: things like transaction speed, private key (mis)management, clunky UI, etc don't really apply to what is presently being done with VIDT. It is, in my opinion, one of the most business consumer-friendly, mass-adoptable tokens in all of crypto. That was another segue, because:
  3. They already have clients who regularly use the service, like AmSpec (oil and gas), Airbus, Krohne, CMS Law, etc. These clients come from a broad spectrum of industries and have come to rely on VIDT for helping them to defend against fraud. The company has been in profit since 2019.
  4. Interoperability - VIDT recently unveiled (out of nowhere, I might add) a new product called DataLink, which focuses on bridging data across all of the major cloud hosting services (AWS, Azure, Zap, etc) and major blockchains including Ethereum, DigiByte, LTO, Waves, Binance Chain, Hyperledger, and more to come. The significance of interoperability is probably clear to anyone who sees where blockchain is going, but to sum it up briefly: the odds of one chain ruling them all are very low, but for blockchain to really be mainstream we need to know that the various chains can "talk" to each other. We also need to make sure that off chain sources can easily communicate with on-chain services. Starting to get the picture? In pure and grounded business terms, we are likely to see most (if not all) of the major chains partner with VIDT as the service grows in popularity and scope. Oh hey, another transition...
  5. Use cases are increasing in scope and ambition, and I absolutely love to see it. VIDT has several projects in the works that have the potential to fulfill a lot of the promise that was envisioned when blockchain started buzzing. IBM is pleased with the progress of their collaboration with VIDT for capturing environmental sensor data for their Internet of Environments initiative, and this is expected to expand significantly. The VIDT team have also partnered with DigiByte on the Veritas project, which is securing digital identities, particularly for social media. That twitter hack seems relevant, doesn't it? And one of my favorites: VIDT has partnered with Fantom on a project that aims to bring transparency and authenticity to the world of politics by working with the government of Afghanistan, an effort that has been hinted to have a much larger scope than meets the eye. And more scope means more verifications using VIDT, which means more tokens spent!
  6. Tokenomics are among the best in all of crypto. Seriously. The total supply is under 60m, with just over 43m (75%) already in circulation. Clients pay a fixed fee in fiat, and tokens are used at the equivalent price. This means, of course, that more demand will put pressure on the token price. And yes, if the token price is higher than the fixed rate, less VIDT will be used per transaction, but at that point the number of transactions will likely greatly offset that. In addition, there are monthly token buybacks and burns. Yes, every month. It is a relatively scarce (by crypto terms) token that will literally increase in scarcity every single month, regardless of market conditions. The token is divisible by 18 decimal places, so the deflationary process can continue for a very, very long time.
  7. The team is amazing. I saved this for last because as an investor, one of the key indicators in deciding whether something is worth putting my money in (potentially long term) is the team. And I will say it now, there is no team like the VIDT team. These guys are humble but hungry. VIDT is their passion. This is their baby. They communicate regularly via twitter and the official/news channel on Telegram, as well as on LinkedIn. You can see their faces, you know their names, they're in print, in videos, etc. Always meeting with potential clients, always building new functionality, always working hard. They have this energy because they know they're building something special.
Looking at all that I've written, I have to apologize because I really did try to make this a brief summary. I suppose I'll close with some scattered but bullish thoughts:
There have been roughly 6 straight weeks of news that coincides with one of the nicest looking charts I have seen: green on every timeline out to 1 year, all time high and price discovery seem to be within reach. The growth has been steady. Wallet count is over 6,000 and growing. And yet... it seems like most in the crypto space still either haven't heard of VIDT or still have yet to dive into the research. It's still not on any exchange bigger than Kucoin. It is already one of the tokens that sees the most use, and provides a bridge to blockchain for the outside world. Did I mention they certify diamonds now?
Considering all of the above (and much more, truly) and looking at some of the garbage that still sits above it in ranking, I really believe that this will be a Top 25 token before too long. The crypto world is starting to wake up to how big this token with a simple little elevator pitch could be, and the real marketwide FOMO doesn't begin until the big name "influencers" start talking about it. So with a $15.5 market cap this is still very much flying under the radar. Maybe the use case isn't sexy. Neither are "oracles," until you ask yourself how many companies could actually benefit from using them. That's the light bulb moment, and suddenly it all makes sense.
Thanks for your time, always be safe and do your own research.
submitted by jredsama to CryptoMoonShots [link] [comments]

Why i’m bullish on Zilliqa (long read)

Edit: TL;DR added in the comments
 
Hey all, I've been researching coins since 2017 and have gone through 100s of them in the last 3 years. I got introduced to blockchain via Bitcoin of course, analyzed Ethereum thereafter and from that moment I have a keen interest in smart contact platforms. I’m passionate about Ethereum but I find Zilliqa to have a better risk-reward ratio. Especially because Zilliqa has found an elegant balance between being secure, decentralized and scalable in my opinion.
 
Below I post my analysis of why from all the coins I went through I’m most bullish on Zilliqa (yes I went through Tezos, EOS, NEO, VeChain, Harmony, Algorand, Cardano etc.). Note that this is not investment advice and although it's a thorough analysis there is obviously some bias involved. Looking forward to what you all think!
 
Fun fact: the name Zilliqa is a play on ‘silica’ silicon dioxide which means “Silicon for the high-throughput consensus computer.”
 
This post is divided into (i) Technology, (ii) Business & Partnerships, and (iii) Marketing & Community. I’ve tried to make the technology part readable for a broad audience. If you’ve ever tried understanding the inner workings of Bitcoin and Ethereum you should be able to grasp most parts. Otherwise, just skim through and once you are zoning out head to the next part.
 
Technology and some more:
 
Introduction
 
The technology is one of the main reasons why I’m so bullish on Zilliqa. First thing you see on their website is: “Zilliqa is a high-performance, high-security blockchain platform for enterprises and next-generation applications.” These are some bold statements.
 
Before we deep dive into the technology let’s take a step back in time first as they have quite the history. The initial research paper from which Zilliqa originated dates back to August 2016: Elastico: A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open Blockchains where Loi Luu (Kyber Network) is one of the co-authors. Other ideas that led to the development of what Zilliqa has become today are: Bitcoin-NG, collective signing CoSi, ByzCoin and Omniledger.
 
The technical white paper was made public in August 2017 and since then they have achieved everything stated in the white paper and also created their own open source intermediate level smart contract language called Scilla (functional programming language similar to OCaml) too.
 
Mainnet is live since the end of January 2019 with daily transaction rates growing continuously. About a week ago mainnet reached 5 million transactions, 500.000+ addresses in total along with 2400 nodes keeping the network decentralized and secure. Circulating supply is nearing 11 billion and currently only mining rewards are left. The maximum supply is 21 billion with annual inflation being 7.13% currently and will only decrease with time.
 
Zilliqa realized early on that the usage of public cryptocurrencies and smart contracts were increasing but decentralized, secure, and scalable alternatives were lacking in the crypto space. They proposed to apply sharding onto a public smart contract blockchain where the transaction rate increases almost linear with the increase in the amount of nodes. More nodes = higher transaction throughput and increased decentralization. Sharding comes in many forms and Zilliqa uses network-, transaction- and computational sharding. Network sharding opens up the possibility of using transaction- and computational sharding on top. Zilliqa does not use state sharding for now. We’ll come back to this later.
 
Before we continue dissecting how Zilliqa achieves such from a technological standpoint it’s good to keep in mind that a blockchain being decentralised and secure and scalable is still one of the main hurdles in allowing widespread usage of decentralised networks. In my opinion this needs to be solved first before blockchains can get to the point where they can create and add large scale value. So I invite you to read the next section to grasp the underlying fundamentals. Because after all these premises need to be true otherwise there isn’t a fundamental case to be bullish on Zilliqa, right?
 
Down the rabbit hole
 
How have they achieved this? Let’s define the basics first: key players on Zilliqa are the users and the miners. A user is anybody who uses the blockchain to transfer funds or run smart contracts. Miners are the (shard) nodes in the network who run the consensus protocol and get rewarded for their service in Zillings (ZIL). The mining network is divided into several smaller networks called shards, which is also referred to as ‘network sharding’. Miners subsequently are randomly assigned to a shard by another set of miners called DS (Directory Service) nodes. The regular shards process transactions and the outputs of these shards are eventually combined by the DS shard as they reach consensus on the final state. More on how these DS shards reach consensus (via pBFT) will be explained later on.
 
The Zilliqa network produces two types of blocks: DS blocks and Tx blocks. One DS Block consists of 100 Tx Blocks. And as previously mentioned there are two types of nodes concerned with reaching consensus: shard nodes and DS nodes. Becoming a shard node or DS node is being defined by the result of a PoW cycle (Ethash) at the beginning of the DS Block. All candidate mining nodes compete with each other and run the PoW (Proof-of-Work) cycle for 60 seconds and the submissions achieving the highest difficulty will be allowed on the network. And to put it in perspective: the average difficulty for one DS node is ~ 2 Th/s equaling 2.000.000 Mh/s or 55 thousand+ GeForce GTX 1070 / 8 GB GPUs at 35.4 Mh/s. Each DS Block 10 new DS nodes are allowed. And a shard node needs to provide around 8.53 GH/s currently (around 240 GTX 1070s). Dual mining ETH/ETC and ZIL is possible and can be done via mining software such as Phoenix and Claymore. There are pools and if you have large amounts of hashing power (Ethash) available you could mine solo.
 
The PoW cycle of 60 seconds is a peak performance and acts as an entry ticket to the network. The entry ticket is called a sybil resistance mechanism and makes it incredibly hard for adversaries to spawn lots of identities and manipulate the network with these identities. And after every 100 Tx Blocks which corresponds to roughly 1,5 hour this PoW process repeats. In between these 1,5 hour, no PoW needs to be done meaning Zilliqa’s energy consumption to keep the network secure is low. For more detailed information on how mining works click here.
Okay, hats off to you. You have made it this far. Before we go any deeper down the rabbit hole we first must understand why Zilliqa goes through all of the above technicalities and understand a bit more what a blockchain on a more fundamental level is. Because the core of Zilliqa’s consensus protocol relies on the usage of pBFT (practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance) we need to know more about state machines and their function. Navigate to Viewblock, a Zilliqa block explorer, and just come back to this article. We will use this site to navigate through a few concepts.
 
We have established that Zilliqa is a public and distributed blockchain. Meaning that everyone with an internet connection can send ZILs, trigger smart contracts, etc. and there is no central authority who fully controls the network. Zilliqa and other public and distributed blockchains (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) can also be defined as state machines.
 
Taking the liberty of paraphrasing examples and definitions given by Samuel Brooks’ medium article, he describes the definition of a blockchain (like Zilliqa) as: “A peer-to-peer, append-only datastore that uses consensus to synchronize cryptographically-secure data”.
 
Next, he states that: "blockchains are fundamentally systems for managing valid state transitions”. For some more context, I recommend reading the whole medium article to get a better grasp of the definitions and understanding of state machines. Nevertheless, let’s try to simplify and compile it into a single paragraph. Take traffic lights as an example: all its states (red, amber, and green) are predefined, all possible outcomes are known and it doesn’t matter if you encounter the traffic light today or tomorrow. It will still behave the same. Managing the states of a traffic light can be done by triggering a sensor on the road or pushing a button resulting in one traffic lights’ state going from green to red (via amber) and another light from red to green.
 
With public blockchains like Zilliqa, this isn’t so straightforward and simple. It started with block #1 almost 1,5 years ago and every 45 seconds or so a new block linked to the previous block is being added. Resulting in a chain of blocks with transactions in it that everyone can verify from block #1 to the current #647.000+ block. The state is ever changing and the states it can find itself in are infinite. And while the traffic light might work together in tandem with various other traffic lights, it’s rather insignificant comparing it to a public blockchain. Because Zilliqa consists of 2400 nodes who need to work together to achieve consensus on what the latest valid state is while some of these nodes may have latency or broadcast issues, drop offline or are deliberately trying to attack the network, etc.
 
Now go back to the Viewblock page take a look at the amount of transaction, addresses, block and DS height and then hit refresh. Obviously as expected you see new incremented values on one or all parameters. And how did the Zilliqa blockchain manage to transition from a previous valid state to the latest valid state? By using pBFT to reach consensus on the latest valid state.
 
After having obtained the entry ticket, miners execute pBFT to reach consensus on the ever-changing state of the blockchain. pBFT requires a series of network communication between nodes, and as such there is no GPU involved (but CPU). Resulting in the total energy consumed to keep the blockchain secure, decentralized and scalable being low.
 
pBFT stands for practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance and is an optimization on the Byzantine Fault Tolerant algorithm. To quote Blockonomi: “In the context of distributed systems, Byzantine Fault Tolerance is the ability of a distributed computer network to function as desired and correctly reach a sufficient consensus despite malicious components (nodes) of the system failing or propagating incorrect information to other peers.” Zilliqa is such a distributed computer network and depends on the honesty of the nodes (shard and DS) to reach consensus and to continuously update the state with the latest block. If pBFT is a new term for you I can highly recommend the Blockonomi article.
 
The idea of pBFT was introduced in 1999 - one of the authors even won a Turing award for it - and it is well researched and applied in various blockchains and distributed systems nowadays. If you want more advanced information than the Blockonomi link provides click here. And if you’re in between Blockonomi and the University of Singapore read the Zilliqa Design Story Part 2 dating from October 2017.
Quoting from the Zilliqa tech whitepaper: “pBFT relies upon a correct leader (which is randomly selected) to begin each phase and proceed when the sufficient majority exists. In case the leader is byzantine it can stall the entire consensus protocol. To address this challenge, pBFT offers a view change protocol to replace the byzantine leader with another one.”
 
pBFT can tolerate ⅓ of the nodes being dishonest (offline counts as Byzantine = dishonest) and the consensus protocol will function without stalling or hiccups. Once there are more than ⅓ of dishonest nodes but no more than ⅔ the network will be stalled and a view change will be triggered to elect a new DS leader. Only when more than ⅔ of the nodes are dishonest (66%) double-spend attacks become possible.
 
If the network stalls no transactions can be processed and one has to wait until a new honest leader has been elected. When the mainnet was just launched and in its early phases, view changes happened regularly. As of today the last stalling of the network - and view change being triggered - was at the end of October 2019.
 
Another benefit of using pBFT for consensus besides low energy is the immediate finality it provides. Once your transaction is included in a block and the block is added to the chain it’s done. Lastly, take a look at this article where three types of finality are being defined: probabilistic, absolute and economic finality. Zilliqa falls under the absolute finality (just like Tendermint for example). Although lengthy already we skipped through some of the inner workings from Zilliqa’s consensus: read the Zilliqa Design Story Part 3 and you will be close to having a complete picture on it. Enough about PoW, sybil resistance mechanism, pBFT, etc. Another thing we haven’t looked at yet is the amount of decentralization.
 
Decentralisation
 
Currently, there are four shards, each one of them consisting of 600 nodes. 1 shard with 600 so-called DS nodes (Directory Service - they need to achieve a higher difficulty than shard nodes) and 1800 shard nodes of which 250 are shard guards (centralized nodes controlled by the team). The amount of shard guards has been steadily declining from 1200 in January 2019 to 250 as of May 2020. On the Viewblock statistics, you can see that many of the nodes are being located in the US but those are only the (CPU parts of the) shard nodes who perform pBFT. There is no data from where the PoW sources are coming. And when the Zilliqa blockchain starts reaching its transaction capacity limit, a network upgrade needs to be executed to lift the current cap of maximum 2400 nodes to allow more nodes and formation of more shards which will allow to network to keep on scaling according to demand.
Besides shard nodes there are also seed nodes. The main role of seed nodes is to serve as direct access points (for end-users and clients) to the core Zilliqa network that validates transactions. Seed nodes consolidate transaction requests and forward these to the lookup nodes (another type of nodes) for distribution to the shards in the network. Seed nodes also maintain the entire transaction history and the global state of the blockchain which is needed to provide services such as block explorers. Seed nodes in the Zilliqa network are comparable to Infura on Ethereum.
 
The seed nodes were first only operated by Zilliqa themselves, exchanges and Viewblock. Operators of seed nodes like exchanges had no incentive to open them for the greater public. They were centralised at first. Decentralisation at the seed nodes level has been steadily rolled out since March 2020 ( Zilliqa Improvement Proposal 3 ). Currently the amount of seed nodes is being increased, they are public-facing and at the same time PoS is applied to incentivize seed node operators and make it possible for ZIL holders to stake and earn passive yields. Important distinction: seed nodes are not involved with consensus! That is still PoW as entry ticket and pBFT for the actual consensus.
 
5% of the block rewards are being assigned to seed nodes (from the beginning in 2019) and those are being used to pay out ZIL stakers. The 5% block rewards with an annual yield of 10.03% translate to roughly 610 MM ZILs in total that can be staked. Exchanges use the custodial variant of staking and wallets like Moonlet will use the non-custodial version (starting in Q3 2020). Staking is being done by sending ZILs to a smart contract created by Zilliqa and audited by Quantstamp.
 
With a high amount of DS; shard nodes and seed nodes becoming more decentralized too, Zilliqa qualifies for the label of decentralized in my opinion.
 
Smart contracts
 
Let me start by saying I’m not a developer and my programming skills are quite limited. So I‘m taking the ELI5 route (maybe 12) but if you are familiar with Javascript, Solidity or specifically OCaml please head straight to Scilla - read the docs to get a good initial grasp of how Zilliqa’s smart contract language Scilla works and if you ask yourself “why another programming language?” check this article. And if you want to play around with some sample contracts in an IDE click here. The faucet can be found here. And more information on architecture, dapp development and API can be found on the Developer Portal.
If you are more into listening and watching: check this recent webinar explaining Zilliqa and Scilla. Link is time-stamped so you’ll start right away with a platform introduction, roadmap 2020 and afterwards a proper Scilla introduction.
 
Generalized: programming languages can be divided into being ‘object-oriented’ or ‘functional’. Here is an ELI5 given by software development academy: * “all programs have two basic components, data – what the program knows – and behavior – what the program can do with that data. So object-oriented programming states that combining data and related behaviors in one place, is called “object”, which makes it easier to understand how a particular program works. On the other hand, functional programming argues that data and behavior are different things and should be separated to ensure their clarity.” *
 
Scilla is on the functional side and shares similarities with OCaml: OCaml is a general-purpose programming language with an emphasis on expressiveness and safety. It has an advanced type system that helps catch your mistakes without getting in your way. It's used in environments where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters, is supported by an active community, and has a rich set of libraries and development tools. For all its power, OCaml is also pretty simple, which is one reason it's often used as a teaching language.
 
Scilla is blockchain agnostic, can be implemented onto other blockchains as well, is recognized by academics and won a so-called Distinguished Artifact Award award at the end of last year.
 
One of the reasons why the Zilliqa team decided to create their own programming language focused on preventing smart contract vulnerabilities is that adding logic on a blockchain, programming, means that you cannot afford to make mistakes. Otherwise, it could cost you. It’s all great and fun blockchains being immutable but updating your code because you found a bug isn’t the same as with a regular web application for example. And with smart contracts, it inherently involves cryptocurrencies in some form thus value.
 
Another difference with programming languages on a blockchain is gas. Every transaction you do on a smart contract platform like Zilliqa or Ethereum costs gas. With gas you basically pay for computational costs. Sending a ZIL from address A to address B costs 0.001 ZIL currently. Smart contracts are more complex, often involve various functions and require more gas (if gas is a new concept click here ).
 
So with Scilla, similar to Solidity, you need to make sure that “every function in your smart contract will run as expected without hitting gas limits. An improper resource analysis may lead to situations where funds may get stuck simply because a part of the smart contract code cannot be executed due to gas limits. Such constraints are not present in traditional software systems”. Scilla design story part 1
 
Some examples of smart contract issues you’d want to avoid are: leaking funds, ‘unexpected changes to critical state variables’ (example: someone other than you setting his or her address as the owner of the smart contract after creation) or simply killing a contract.
 
Scilla also allows for formal verification. Wikipedia to the rescue: In the context of hardware and software systems, formal verification is the act of proving or disproving the correctness of intended algorithms underlying a system with respect to a certain formal specification or property, using formal methods of mathematics.
 
Formal verification can be helpful in proving the correctness of systems such as: cryptographic protocols, combinational circuits, digital circuits with internal memory, and software expressed as source code.
 
Scilla is being developed hand-in-hand with formalization of its semantics and its embedding into the Coq proof assistant — a state-of-the art tool for mechanized proofs about properties of programs.”
 
Simply put, with Scilla and accompanying tooling developers can be mathematically sure and proof that the smart contract they’ve written does what he or she intends it to do.
 
Smart contract on a sharded environment and state sharding
 
There is one more topic I’d like to touch on: smart contract execution in a sharded environment (and what is the effect of state sharding). This is a complex topic. I’m not able to explain it any easier than what is posted here. But I will try to compress the post into something easy to digest.
 
Earlier on we have established that Zilliqa can process transactions in parallel due to network sharding. This is where the linear scalability comes from. We can define simple transactions: a transaction from address A to B (Category 1), a transaction where a user interacts with one smart contract (Category 2) and the most complex ones where triggering a transaction results in multiple smart contracts being involved (Category 3). The shards are able to process transactions on their own without interference of the other shards. With Category 1 transactions that is doable, with Category 2 transactions sometimes if that address is in the same shard as the smart contract but with Category 3 you definitely need communication between the shards. Solving that requires to make a set of communication rules the protocol needs to follow in order to process all transactions in a generalised fashion.
 
And this is where the downsides of state sharding comes in currently. All shards in Zilliqa have access to the complete state. Yes the state size (0.1 GB at the moment) grows and all of the nodes need to store it but it also means that they don’t need to shop around for information available on other shards. Requiring more communication and adding more complexity. Computer science knowledge and/or developer knowledge required links if you want to dig further: Scilla - language grammar Scilla - Foundations for Verifiable Decentralised Computations on a Blockchain Gas Accounting NUS x Zilliqa: Smart contract language workshop
 
Easier to follow links on programming Scilla https://learnscilla.com/home Ivan on Tech
 
Roadmap / Zilliqa 2.0
 
There is no strict defined roadmap but here are topics being worked on. And via the Zilliqa website there is also more information on the projects they are working on.
 
Business & Partnerships
 
It’s not only technology in which Zilliqa seems to be excelling as their ecosystem has been expanding and starting to grow rapidly. The project is on a mission to provide OpenFinance (OpFi) to the world and Singapore is the right place to be due to its progressive regulations and futuristic thinking. Singapore has taken a proactive approach towards cryptocurrencies by introducing the Payment Services Act 2019 (PS Act). Among other things, the PS Act will regulate intermediaries dealing with certain cryptocurrencies, with a particular focus on consumer protection and anti-money laundering. It will also provide a stable regulatory licensing and operating framework for cryptocurrency entities, effectively covering all crypto businesses and exchanges based in Singapore. According to PWC 82% of the surveyed executives in Singapore reported blockchain initiatives underway and 13% of them have already brought the initiatives live to the market. There is also an increasing list of organizations that are starting to provide digital payment services. Moreover, Singaporean blockchain developers Building Cities Beyond has recently created an innovation $15 million grant to encourage development on its ecosystem. This all suggests that Singapore tries to position itself as (one of) the leading blockchain hubs in the world.
 
Zilliqa seems to already take advantage of this and recently helped launch Hg Exchange on their platform, together with financial institutions PhillipCapital, PrimePartners and Fundnel. Hg Exchange, which is now approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), uses smart contracts to represent digital assets. Through Hg Exchange financial institutions worldwide can use Zilliqa's safe-by-design smart contracts to enable the trading of private equities. For example, think of companies such as Grab, Airbnb, SpaceX that are not available for public trading right now. Hg Exchange will allow investors to buy shares of private companies & unicorns and capture their value before an IPO. Anquan, the main company behind Zilliqa, has also recently announced that they became a partner and shareholder in TEN31 Bank, which is a fully regulated bank allowing for tokenization of assets and is aiming to bridge the gap between conventional banking and the blockchain world. If STOs, the tokenization of assets, and equity trading will continue to increase, then Zilliqa’s public blockchain would be the ideal candidate due to its strategic positioning, partnerships, regulatory compliance and the technology that is being built on top of it.
 
What is also very encouraging is their focus on banking the un(der)banked. They are launching a stablecoin basket starting with XSGD. As many of you know, stablecoins are currently mostly used for trading. However, Zilliqa is actively trying to broaden the use case of stablecoins. I recommend everybody to read this text that Amrit Kumar wrote (one of the co-founders). These stablecoins will be integrated in the traditional markets and bridge the gap between the crypto world and the traditional world. This could potentially revolutionize and legitimise the crypto space if retailers and companies will for example start to use stablecoins for payments or remittances, instead of it solely being used for trading.
 
Zilliqa also released their DeFi strategic roadmap (dating November 2019) which seems to be aligning well with their OpFi strategy. A non-custodial DEX is coming to Zilliqa made by Switcheo which allows cross-chain trading (atomic swaps) between ETH, EOS and ZIL based tokens. They also signed a Memorandum of Understanding for a (soon to be announced) USD stablecoin. And as Zilliqa is all about regulations and being compliant, I’m speculating on it to be a regulated USD stablecoin. Furthermore, XSGD is already created and visible on block explorer and XIDR (Indonesian Stablecoin) is also coming soon via StraitsX. Here also an overview of the Tech Stack for Financial Applications from September 2019. Further quoting Amrit Kumar on this:
 
There are two basic building blocks in DeFi/OpFi though: 1) stablecoins as you need a non-volatile currency to get access to this market and 2) a dex to be able to trade all these financial assets. The rest are built on top of these blocks.
 
So far, together with our partners and community, we have worked on developing these building blocks with XSGD as a stablecoin. We are working on bringing a USD-backed stablecoin as well. We will soon have a decentralised exchange developed by Switcheo. And with HGX going live, we are also venturing into the tokenization space. More to come in the future.”
 
Additionally, they also have this ZILHive initiative that injects capital into projects. There have been already 6 waves of various teams working on infrastructure, innovation and research, and they are not from ASEAN or Singapore only but global: see Grantees breakdown by country. Over 60 project teams from over 20 countries have contributed to Zilliqa's ecosystem. This includes individuals and teams developing wallets, explorers, developer toolkits, smart contract testing frameworks, dapps, etc. As some of you may know, Unstoppable Domains (UD) blew up when they launched on Zilliqa. UD aims to replace cryptocurrency addresses with a human-readable name and allows for uncensorable websites. Zilliqa will probably be the only one able to handle all these transactions onchain due to ability to scale and its resulting low fees which is why the UD team launched this on Zilliqa in the first place. Furthermore, Zilliqa also has a strong emphasis on security, compliance, and privacy, which is why they partnered with companies like Elliptic, ChainSecurity (part of PwC Switzerland), and Incognito. Their sister company Aqilliz (Zilliqa spelled backwards) focuses on revolutionizing the digital advertising space and is doing interesting things like using Zilliqa to track outdoor digital ads with companies like Foodpanda.
 
Zilliqa is listed on nearly all major exchanges, having several different fiat-gateways and recently have been added to Binance’s margin trading and futures trading with really good volume. They also have a very impressive team with good credentials and experience. They don't just have “tech people”. They have a mix of tech people, business people, marketeers, scientists, and more. Naturally, it's good to have a mix of people with different skill sets if you work in the crypto space.
 
Marketing & Community
 
Zilliqa has a very strong community. If you just follow their Twitter their engagement is much higher for a coin that has approximately 80k followers. They also have been ‘coin of the day’ by LunarCrush many times. LunarCrush tracks real-time cryptocurrency value and social data. According to their data, it seems Zilliqa has a more fundamental and deeper understanding of marketing and community engagement than almost all other coins. While almost all coins have been a bit frozen in the last months, Zilliqa seems to be on its own bull run. It was somewhere in the 100s a few months ago and is currently ranked #46 on CoinGecko. Their official Telegram also has over 20k people and is very active, and their community channel which is over 7k now is more active and larger than many other official channels. Their local communities also seem to be growing.
 
Moreover, their community started ‘Zillacracy’ together with the Zilliqa core team ( see www.zillacracy.com ). It’s a community-run initiative where people from all over the world are now helping with marketing and development on Zilliqa. Since its launch in February 2020 they have been doing a lot and will also run their own non-custodial seed node for staking. This seed node will also allow them to start generating revenue for them to become a self sustaining entity that could potentially scale up to become a decentralized company working in parallel with the Zilliqa core team. Comparing it to all the other smart contract platforms (e.g. Cardano, EOS, Tezos etc.) they don't seem to have started a similar initiative (correct me if I’m wrong though). This suggests in my opinion that these other smart contract platforms do not fully understand how to utilize the ‘power of the community’. This is something you cannot ‘buy with money’ and gives many projects in the space a disadvantage.
 
Zilliqa also released two social products called SocialPay and Zeeves. SocialPay allows users to earn ZILs while tweeting with a specific hashtag. They have recently used it in partnership with the Singapore Red Cross for a marketing campaign after their initial pilot program. It seems like a very valuable social product with a good use case. I can see a lot of traditional companies entering the space through this product, which they seem to suggest will happen. Tokenizing hashtags with smart contracts to get network effect is a very smart and innovative idea.
 
Regarding Zeeves, this is a tipping bot for Telegram. They already have 1000s of signups and they plan to keep upgrading it for more and more people to use it (e.g. they recently have added a quiz features). They also use it during AMAs to reward people in real-time. It’s a very smart approach to grow their communities and get familiar with ZIL. I can see this becoming very big on Telegram. This tool suggests, again, that the Zilliqa team has a deeper understanding of what the crypto space and community needs and is good at finding the right innovative tools to grow and scale.
 
To be honest, I haven’t covered everything (i’m also reaching the character limited haha). So many updates happening lately that it's hard to keep up, such as the International Monetary Fund mentioning Zilliqa in their report, custodial and non-custodial Staking, Binance Margin, Futures, Widget, entering the Indian market, and more. The Head of Marketing Colin Miles has also released this as an overview of what is coming next. And last but not least, Vitalik Buterin has been mentioning Zilliqa lately acknowledging Zilliqa and mentioning that both projects have a lot of room to grow. There is much more info of course and a good part of it has been served to you on a silver platter. I invite you to continue researching by yourself :-) And if you have any comments or questions please post here!
submitted by haveyouheardaboutit to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Wallet compromised

Hi, today I sent 17 ether out from Binance to my ledger nano s wallet. I received 15 Ether, 2 Ether were gone. I immediately checked the TXID on Binance, to my best knowledge the ID only showed 15 Ether the first 3-4 minutes. After waiting and reaching out to Binance and having the tech support on the line, we checked the TXID again and 17 Ether showed up and the transaction was successful. I know this is against all logic, but I feel I have to add this Info to stay truthful to what happened.
17 Ether arrived in my wallet but 1.8 ether were immediately further send out (30 seconds after the 17 arrived according to the TX). I checked the block explorer and it showed 2 additional transactions with each 0.9 Ether spread to two separate wallets. On further research I realized that this exact wallet already took 0.9 Ether the day before and another 2.1 Ether 8 days before.
My Seed is stored and nobody ever had access to it. Guaranteed. Same goes for the ledger. It is at a safe place, nobody besides me has access to it.
This one wallet always receives my funds and then further spreads them to other wallets, some even end up in contract addresses. These wallets have many small transactions therefore it looks like this is a bigger scheme. I could find large sums of ether in some of these last wallets, therefore it looks like a bigger organized setup. Some of the wallets even received direct deposits of a wallet called "binance 4" and "indodax", an Indonesian exchange which gives me some hope that the owner can be tracked down.
My first question is: How can someone take out my ether? When I deposited the 17 Ether today from Binance I did not confirm anything on my ledger nano s. Obviously sending funds from Binance doesn't require such action. How can it be that exactly 30 seconds after the 17 ether hit my wallet, 2x 0.9 ether could be sent directly to two further wallets. Again, I did not confirm these transactions on my nano s.
Considering the size of the receiving wallets I am afraid that this is a bigger scheme and I worry deeply about the security of my funds. Meanwhile I am scared to send out my other funds as I fear a smart contract deployment or some sort on my wallet that always takes money off each transaction.
Some additional info on my user behavior: I use IDEX frequently. If you buy at Idex the process to acquire tokens is often connected to quickly confirming several transactions. If not quickly confirmed the order is not available anymore. Logically, lets say 4 transactions in a row are confirmed without being able to check the text of each transaction. I see this as the only way someone could have slipped in lets say a smart contract confirmation to always take out 0.9 ethereum when a transaction happens, or what ever other options are possible. Fact is, I lost 5 ether until now and I am deeply worried. I need assistance in regards to what to do with my remaining funds.
I need an expert ASAP to further check whats going on. How can I get quick support? This is Urgent, I just don´t feel for writing in an alarming way to make sure someone takes action quickly.
submitted by ElectronicBadger8508 to ledgerwallet [link] [comments]

Binance.US Deposits

I’m trying to ACH deposits of USD funds in Binance.us. It continuously fails without giving any reason for the failure. The transaction history just says failed. I tried to remove and add account again it still fails.
More Info: My Bank Account has 10X funds. Tried from two different ACH account still fails. Trying to withdraw funds within my daily allocated limit. Customer care is so annoying. It takes 3-5 business days to get a reply if any. Most times they just close the case without resolving. Tried a Wire transfer of funds too. It’s been two days, it’s still not deposited.
After charging all kind of transaction fees for every order, I think it’s so unfair to always get struck with issues like these. Exchanges play a major role in timely investments and withdrawals.
I understand that Binance has millions of users and so it might be challenging to give customer care support for millions of users. But there are like billions of transactions happening and more billions of money charged in transaction fee. This is not a service I would expect when I pay so much. People are loosing money because of these issues.
Being in US is this so much to expect from a China based customer care?
Why can’t Binance help please?
(I know few other exchanges like KuCoin which provides chat support which gives instant resolution to problems)
submitted by cheaters_dont_stop to binance [link] [comments]

Binance vs ByBit vs Bittrex vs Bitfinex vs Kraken vs Bitmart vs Probit.... (and so on), which ones are the "real deal"?

Hi guys, i've been away from the crypto world for a while (used to be very into it since late 2016 to late 2018), and i recently started investing in crypto again (long story short: back in 2017 i had no money and tried to become a "Bitcoin millionaire", then the whole thing went down and i had to reinvent myself, so i started an online business and 2 years later i'm almost a millionaire so i started investing in crypto again, cus i can afford it for real right now).
I'm also getting into trading as a side business, i already have 2 side businesses (my ex core-business and another really developed business) but i don't actually spend a lot of time working actively, so i thought i might add another stream of income from trading.
In 2017/2018 i used to trade on Bittrex, Hitbtc, Kraken and Cryptopia (that doesn't exist anymore) and as things have changed a lot i was wondering if any of these brokers/exchanges i mentioned is actually an unreliable one with some good marketing on it or if they're actually good brokers, i'd also like to know if the ones i used to use are still valuable, i kinda trust Binance as it was already big back in the days too but never really had to use it. But how about the others?
I know each one has altcoins other might not have so if you really need to buy that coin all you have to do is register to a certain exchange (i mean, i registered to AEX to buy an altcoin in 2017), but except for this, are there any notoriously unreliable websites among the ones i mentioned?
And also, are there any other reliable exchanges?
submitted by mattex93 to CryptoCurrencies [link] [comments]

After Robinhood Suicide, Crypto Exchanges Must Stop Acting Like Casinos: bitFlyer Exec - CoinDesk

Many exchanges were designed to encourage users to trade as frequently as possible, often with money they don’t have, and resembled casinos more than responsible trading platforms, said Joel Edgerton, chief operating officer at bitFlyer U.S.
“There are too many exchanges that are run like casinos and exploit their customers,” he said.
Edgerton spoke to CoinDesk just over a week after a 20-year-old student, Alexander Kearns, killed himself after falsely believing he had got himself into more than $700,000-worth of debt by trading complex options contracts on Robinhood – an app-based trading platform with a young, retail-oriented following.
It later came to light that the negative balance was a temporary phase in between contract execution – i.e. Kearns wasn’t actually in the red. But Robinhood has come under heavy criticism for allowing amateur traders to access such complex instruments without safeguards to avoid confusion and, in this case, tragedy.
Late last week, Robinhood announced a $250,000 donation to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and vowed to add safeguards to its platform, such as tightening eligibility requirements for complex options trades.
See also: The Chad Index Versus Doomer Internet Money: The Breakdown Weekly Recap
While Binance’s CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao said in response last week that his exchange already implemented a “Responsible Trading” feature, Edgerton, a former head of operations at the insurance arm of French bank BNP Paribas, said the exchange was trying to shield itself from further criticism.
“I would say CZ’s response was mercenary. He is using a kid’s death to pitch his company and Binance is actually part of the problem,” he explained. The platform gets users hooked and their anti-addiction policy “highlights the fact that they built the product to be addictive,” he said.
Tweet: https://twitter.com/Joel_bitFlyer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1274038400295657472%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.coindesk.com%2Fcrypto-exchanges-casinos-robinhood-suicide-bitflyer
Any crypto exchange that offered 125x leverage indiscriminately – which Binance began offering in October – isn’t serious about customer protection, Edgerton continued. BitFlyer, which opened a U.S. office in 2017, says it already restricts access to leverage and can flag or even ban users that display troubling trading patterns. The Tokyo-based exchange ranks ninth globally, according to CoinGecko, and is the market leader in Japan.
It was reported last summer a Chinese bitcoin trader killed himself after a 100x position on derivatives exchange BitMEX was liquidated, a loss of about $16.4 million in a single trade. Around the same time, an anonymous student trader said he was having suicidal thoughts after losing thousands of dollars on several leveraged trades on the same platform.
Arthur Hayes, BitMEX’s CEO, has previously defended his business, arguing that in a free market, customers can always move onto other platforms if they worry about being exploited or defrauded.
When contacted by CoinDesk, Binance declined to comment. BitMEX hadn’t responded to a similar request by press time.
See also: BitMEX Sees Biggest Short Squeeze in 8 Months After Bitcoin Surge
Cryptocurrency exchanges have more of a role to play in customer protection, Edgerton said. Regulators worldwide cap leverage for retail investors, both in crypto and in traditional assets, such as equities. Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) halved maximum leverage down to two times the value of the deposit this year.
As such, there’s no reason an exchange should offer 100x leverage on top of highly volatile assets without first checking whether the investor knows what they are doing and that they have the income to cover that level of exposure, argued Edgerton.
“We have a responsibility to provide products that are suitable to our clients,” he added. The Robinhood suicide “is what happens when companies focus on tech and profits rather than doing the right thing for their customers.”
Article link: https://www.coindesk.com/crypto-exchanges-casinos-robinhood-suicide-bitflyer
submitted by egglove48 to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

Helpful PH Telegram channels worth subscribing :)

Just sharing a list of Telegram channels I've been following. Feel free to add on to the list! ✌️
Lifestyle BandwagonPH (go-to source for all music lovers) Lokalista (Collection of locally made product and services) LuzonCarpool (for ridesharing within Luzon)
News: PH Coronavirus Updates PHLNews
Finance: BitcoinatbpPinasTube (Crypto and money discussion) BinanceFilipino (Crypto discussion) forextraderphilippines
Useful Bots: PSEibot (informs you of Philippine stock prices)
submitted by joewelle_03 to Philippines [link] [comments]

Swipe Lists & Partners with Band Protocol for Scalable Oracles on SwipeFi Launch

Swipe Lists & Partners with Band Protocol for Scalable Oracles on SwipeFi Launch

https://preview.redd.it/ntzmlhbodai51.png?width=4200&format=png&auto=webp&s=b340b139b478d0e0a3ea4f21ae70b0a850f24db7
Swipe is thrilled to announce that it has formed a strategic partnership with Band Protocol for the implementation of Band Protocol’s secure and scalable oracles on the launch of SwipeFi, the money market protocol coming soon to Binance Smart Chain. Additionally, both teams have been working to integrate a custom oracle script on BandChain for a more cost-effective and refined SXP-USD price oracle that will improve the existing oracle design that only updates once every 24 hours or per 1% price deviation.
Swipe has also listed BAND on the Swipe Wallet and Swipe Visa Card Platform so users can buy, sell, convert and spend BAND at over 60 million merchants worldwide.
SwipeFi is the first proposed multi-asset money market protocol to be launched on Binance Smart Chain which will include stablecoins and various cryptocurrencies. Since collateral pledged and borrowed will have fiat value and be part of the liquidation and credit ratios, Swipe will require accurate and real-time price feeds that will be compatible with Binance Smart Chain without exorbitant costs or technical requirements for cross-chain compatibility.
Using BandChain, an independent blockchain built specifically for oracle computations, SwipeFi developers can create fine-tuned custom decentralized oracles that specify any external data source to connect to, aggregation methods and update parameters. This means that SwipeFi will no longer be limited to by predetermined datasets or delayed data arising from the limitations of particular blockchain networks such as a congestion that stalled Ethereum-based oracle feeds for almost 6 hours. Through our strategic partnership with Band Protocol, Swipe will utilize the Band oracles to exhaustively support all the price feeds (BTC, ETH, BNB, SXP, BUSD, TUSD) required to accurately price and secure collateral assets for SwipeFi to be a truly scalable application on Binance Smart Chain.
Joselito Lizarondo, Swipe CEO, stated, “We are excited to work with Band Protocol to support all of our oracle needs for SwipeFi which achieves our priorities of scalability, accuracy, and security of data. Through Band Protocol’s customizable oracle technology, we will utilize numerous data providers so there never is a central point of failure and we are thrilled to add the Band Price Oracles to our ecosystem.”
Soravis Srinawakoon, Band Protocol CEO & Co-Founder said, “Band Protocol is thrilled to support SwipeFi with highly decentralized oracle technology upon their launch. This will ensure that collateral, liquidation and credit ratio protocols consume data from multiple high-quality data sources in a decentralized manner that provides the highest level of security guarantee.”
More details surrounding this partnership will be announced shortly along with the implementation of our custom oracle for SXP-USD built on Band Protocol. Users can now deposit BAND on the Swipe Wallet platform as well as buy and sell it with their linked bank accounts and credit cards.
About Swipe
Swipe is a multi-asset digital wallet and Visa debit card platform designed to let users buy, sell, and spend their cryptocurrencies. Swipe is headquartered in the Philippines with operations in the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, and Canada. The Swipe platform enables users to spend cryptocurrencies in real-time without having to convert the transactions prior manually. Users can also buy/sell cryptocurrencies with their linked bank accounts globally. For more information, visit www.swipe.io
About Band Protocol
Band Protocol is a cross-chain data oracle platform that aggregates and connects real-world data and APIs to smart contracts. Blockchains are great at immutable storage and deterministic, verifiable computations — however, they cannot securely access data available outside the blockchain networks. Band Protocol enables smart contract applications such as DeFi, prediction markets, and games to be built on-chain without relying on the single point of failure of a centralized oracle. Band Protocol is backed by a strong network of stakeholders including Sequoia Capital, one of the top venture capital firms in the world, and the leading cryptocurrency exchange, Binance.
Website | Whitepaper | Telegram | Medium | Twitter | Reddit | Github
submitted by SwipeWallet to Swipe_io [link] [comments]

"Swap" is Poised for Take-off


https://preview.redd.it/mnxeb74hk4j51.jpg?width=990&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=32d152a7495971c10e1af12185abe5e77b61fd14

How popular is DeFi?
Link, known as the leader of the oracle machine, has increased by 305.19% for the past three months, with an investment return of 17,052%, climbing to the fifth spot in the cryptocurrency ranking list by market value in the short term;
Since its issuance, YFI, which has soared 350 times all the way, has attracted 630 million US dollars of investment in 5 days, and was even dubbed the next Bitcoin in this circle;
From Comp for lending, KNC and BAL, governance tokens for decentralized exchanges, to SNX which is a stable currency payment network, various governance tokens of the DeFi ecosystem have emerged in an endless stream, stirring the blood in the market.
Such a boom is not only reflected in the currency price, but also pushes the brand new DEX based on the AMM (automated market making) model an overnight hit. UniSwap, known as the next-generation casino, has surpassed the world's first-tier centralized exchanges such as Binance, OKex, and Huobi in user activity, daily trading volume, and daily turnover.
With the rapid rise of UniSwap, the DEX threat theory has once again triggered heated discussions among the media and communities in the blockchain industry.
DEX on the Rise
The success of UniSwap is by no means something accidental. As early as 2018 when centralized exchanges suffered the hacker theft one after another, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, predicted that the future lay in decentralized exchanges and that Ethereum, by developing a "better" decentralized platform, could empower the cryptocurrency community to regain the dominance from the centralized cryptocurrency exchange.
To realize the decentralized concept of returning to users their asset ownership, geeks in the blockchain industry have made many attempts.
Kyber Network, Bancor, Balancer, 0X, Curvefi, etc. are all DEXs based on Ethereum blocks. For a long time, affected by the performance of Ethereum and cross-chain issues, these DEXs were once stagnant.
With the lessons learned from Ethereum DEX, newcomers to the DEX have focused on high performance, high TPS, and rich assets as the ultimate goal for product development.
Amid the DEX threat theory, major exchanges have deployed their own public chain DEX products in a response to their respective development strategies: Binance launched Binance DEX on its Binance Chain, and Bittrex Exchange unveiled Ethfinex on the Ethereum and EOSfinex on the EOS blockchain, two platforms where users can exchange for fiat currencies; last year, CoinEx officially launched CoinEx Chain, a public chain dedicated to decentralized transactions, followed by CoinEx DEX.
Since the birth of the DEX in the blockchain world, this field has never run out of competition.
By independent development or other’s advantage?
From 2017 when it was established to 2019 as it stabilized, DEX has witnessed its annual trading volume skyrocketing from less than US$5 million to over US$2.5 billion. As DeFi gains fame and grows rapidly, DEX has grown into the most popular source of money, attracting a flood of speculators. In the past month, the trading volume of the global cryptocurrency market DEX has exceeded US$ 4 billion, more than twice the figure across 2019.
In the past two years, despite the increasingly in-depth exploration in the DEX, the cross-chain issue remains a stumbling block in its development path. DEX will not outperform CEX in the trading experience until a cross-chain solution is worked out.
The concept of DeFi went viral in 2019. With the continuous improvement of the DeFi ecosystem, the current Ethereum blockchain has developed into a complete decentralized financial system, covering mortgage lending, interest from deposit, leveraged trading, token exchange, identity authentication, and other infrastructure essential to traditional financial systems.
In addition to the mouth-watering profit, the DeFi ecosystem has also brought along explosive growth in both the type and quantity of digital assets, making DEX a market favorite. Compared with the DEX dedicated to public chains, the Ethereum-based DEX has been equipped with more possible functions and thus become more attractive thanks to the comprehensive supplementary infrastructure on Ethereum.
This also presents DEX pioneers with new opportunities. Dubbed “Swap’s summer”, the summer of 2020 has seen a market rush in Swap development after UniSwap became a hit.
Miniswap, Justswap, and btswap are no more innovative than UniSwap according to their product structures and white papers.
By comparison, OneSwap has injected unique essence into its product design and governance model based on UniSwap's automated market making.
Upgraded UniSwap
OneSwap, which has a double mining model + order book, has received an investment of tens of millions from CoinEx even before the product is launched. It is known that OneSwap is jointly developed by a group of technology geeks who have engaged in the cryptocurrency community for many years. The project was initiated by a member of the team in an attempt to upgrade UniSwap after he experienced the convenient AMM enabled by UniSwap.
Without limit orders, users have to trade in the price set by the platform, which, however, compromised their experience. In addition, the lack of liquidity mining and transaction mining rewards cannot reduce the losses of liquidity providers caused by unilateral market conditions.
"DEX still has much room for perfection, and could even surpass CEX in trading experience"
The OneSwap development team always believes that UniSwap still has a long way to go before it becomes the strongest DEX in the DeFi ecosystem. They have endeavored to, relying on their abundant experience in exchange product development and digital currency trading, create the most powerful DEX product in the DeFi ecosystem based on smart contracts.
OneSwap is called the “upgraded UniSwap” in the community. By the combination of the Constant Product Market Maker (CPMM) model in the Uniswap project and the on-chain order book, it reduces restrictions on users’ trading, and, through its OneSwap Wallet, improves user interaction methods and further enhances their experience in trading and product usage.
OneSwap boasts one-click token issuance and listing essential to DEX. Unlike the listing review mechanism on Binance DEX, the setting of OneSwap is more consistent with the concept of decentralization. Anyone can put his or her good projects and ideas, if any, into practice through OneSwap without permission.
In terms of product design, OneSwap will add to its function menu the Candlestick chart, order form, and depth chart according to user habits, apart from limit orders. These functions will offer OneSwap users an experience as smooth, easy-to-use, and convenient as in the CEX.
A new source of money? A two-pronged platform with transaction mining + liquidity mining
To support on-chain governance, OneSwap will issue a ERC20 governance token called ONES. The total number of ONES remains constant at 100 million, 50% of which will be used as community funds to support the construction of the OneSwap ecosystem and 50% will be owned by the OneSwap team. Community funds can be applied for through on-chain governance. 5% of the part held by the team will be unlocked initially, and the rest will be unlocked at a rate of 5% every six months until all is unlocked after four and a half years.
After the OneSwap product was launched, the OneSwap team will take part of the initially unlocked tokens as airdrop rewards for the open beta. Then OneSwap will officially start liquidity mining and transaction mining, and the governance token ONES will also be simultaneously launched on centralized trading platforms across the world. The first round of mining activities will last for one month, and mining rewards are yet to be made public.
Liquidity mining is a popular way of obtaining governance tokens in the DeFi ecosystem. Well-known DeFi projects including COMP, Cure, and Banner have all enabled liquid mining.
Transaction mining could date back to 2018 when Fcoin grew popular.
The transaction mining model initiated by Fcoin in 2018 once set off a bull market that year, pushing many investors into financial freedom in the rush of transaction mining. In addition, transaction mining based on the DeFi ecosystem is still a blue ocean, which is not common in the current market. The success of OneSwap's double mining model, if possible, would surely start a craze in the cryptocurrency market.
The OneSwap team has not yet announced specific mining rules, but disclosed that it has developed the smart contract code. To ensure the product security, OneSwap will invite three well-known security agencies in the blockchain industry to audit the code and announce the auditing results in early September at the soonest.
Conclusion
DeFi did not rise to fame without reason in 2020. Such overnight popularity is an inevitable result of Ethereum's efforts to build a decentralized consensus mechanism and improve infrastructure in the past few years. Ethereum has almost become the only public chain in the DeFi circle and the only construction base for well-known DEX. If OneSwap succeeds, it means a huge breakthrough for both DeFi and Ethereum, and decentralization in its true sense is around the corner.
submitted by JuanJuanChan to defi [link] [comments]

Are these the right/best steps to getting ready to stake?

Hi, I own a small amount of Cardano on eToro, but would like to buy a larger amount to be able to stake. I know there is a lot of info within posts here, but it can be a little overwhelming for people new to this. So I have worked out what I think I need to do and have written a checklist below. I was hoping just to get someone to tell me if the steps are correct and my assumptions are right? Also any recommendations on different steps/changes/wallets is welcome. Thanks
I am in the UK so currency I use is GBP
  1. Deposit funds from Bank to Currency Exchange - Kraken. Fee is charged. It seems to me that Kraken's fees (overall, including fees further down list) are lower than Binance, but neither take money deposits without a charge unless you use Etana, but Etana taking a long time to verify my account and seem to have tech issues at the mo
  2. Neither Kraken or Binance have GB /ADA pair so I need to purchase a crypto that does, such as Bitcoin. I believe this is a cheaper way than buying in USD for example. Fees/spread apply to this purchase
  3. Buy ADA using Bitcoin. Fees/spread apply to this purchase
  4. Transfer ADA to Daedalus wallet. Fees apply. I have installed Daedalus
  5. Wait until (some date in near future) then Opt into a stake pool (I will read how to do that later)
  6. If I want to sell Cardano in the future I will need to transfer back to an Exchange wallet and sell for GBP, again with all fees associated with that.
Does this look good? There are quite a few fees along the way, I hope they don't add up to too much.
Thanks
EDIT: Thanks for the help, I have manged to buy some Cardano!! I did a bank transfer to Kraken, which I was then a little worried about as it said it could take 3 days, but it arrived withing 30 minutes. I then purchased Bitcoin (which was hard work for a noob!) and then used that to buy Cardano. I can't transfer to Daedalus as there is a 72 hour lock on withdrawals!
submitted by silvercue to cardano [link] [comments]

Swipe forms a strategic partnership with Kava Labs to further grow the USDX DeFi Ecosystem and lists KAVA and USDX!

Swipe forms a strategic partnership with Kava Labs to further grow the USDX DeFi Ecosystem and lists KAVA and USDX!

https://preview.redd.it/ezammfg1gwg51.png?width=700&format=png&auto=webp&s=234f42e08cf66054c1091d68064075f979627e53
Swipe is thrilled to announce that it has formed a strategic partnership with Kava Labs to further grow the USDX DeFi Ecosystem as Swipe prepares to bring decentralized finance applications to the Binance Smart Chain. Swipe has also listed KAVA and USDX on the Swipe Wallet platform where users can buy and sell KAVA and USDX with a linked bank account or credit/debit card as well as enabled it to be converted and spent at over 60 million merchants worldwide with the Swipe Visa Card.
Currently, Kava has launched a lending platform that supports BNB as a collateral asset to provide BNB holders with the biggest yields in the market. BNB holders can stake BNB on Kava CDP platform and draw USDX, Kava’s stablecoin, as well as earning additional minting rewards in protocol. Bringing USDX into the Swipe ecosystem of products will further strengthen the global stablecoin for cross-compatibility between multiple chains. Swipe plans to add USDX as a preferred stablecoin on its product lines, including SwipeFi, a money market protocol coming to Binance Smart Chain.
Swipe CEO, Joselito Lizarondo, stated, “We are excited to work with Kava Labs to bring their innovative products into the Swipe product line. Being part of the Binance ecosystem, we know that this strategic partnership will continue to push innovative platforms in the market.” Kava Labs CEO, Brian Kerr has this to say about the partnership, “Swipe is the final piece we needed to make Kava’s USDX the smartest place to put your money for modern investors. Now you can hold USDX stablecoins, enjoy a 4.5% APY and spend it freely anywhere with Swipe Visa Cards. Why would anyone want a bank account now?”
About Swipe Swipe is a multi-asset digital wallet and Visa debit card platform designed to let users buy, sell, and spend their cryptocurrencies. Swipe is headquartered in the Philippines with operations in the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, and Canada. The Swipe platform enables users to spend cryptocurrencies in real-time without having to convert the transactions prior manually. Users can also buy/sell cryptocurrencies with their linked bank accounts globally. For more information, visit www.swipe.io
About Kava: Kava is a multi-asset DeFi platform that offers stablecoins, loans, and other financial services for users of major cryptocurrency assets including BTC, XRP, BNB and ATOM to name a few. The Kava platform has two types of tokens, the KAVA token and the USDX stablecoin where the KAVA token is the native token of the Kava blockchain integral in the security, governance, and mechanical functions of the platform. Users can collateralize their crypto assets in exchange for Kava’s stablecoin, USDX. USDX is the highest earning USD denominated account available for modern investors, offering superior yields without additional risk, compared to traditional alternatives like checking and savings accounts that only deliver miniscule returns.
submitted by SwipeWallet to Swipe_io [link] [comments]

Binance Support Number (𝟭𝟴𝟰𝟰*𝟵𝟬𝟳*𝟬𝟱𝟴⑻ 📞 @#$%$%$// : 🔘

Binance Support Number +1-877-566-6366 What Is Binance Support phone number Binance fortify number { +1-877-566-6366}

Binance Support Number +1-877-566-6366 What Is Binance Support phone number Binance fortify number { +1-877-566-6366} Tollfree Number for help in Binance Exchange. Our Binance Support Phone Number is +1-877-566-6366 Contact Here. You should contact our Binance Customer Support Number + 1-877-566-6366,If you are moreover a target of any Binance account issues and face a couple of issues in fixing the issues. Binance is an essential Cryptocurrency exchange publicizing part far and wide. Binance Support, MyGM mode presents a ton of outsene-type investments. The thought was to add a storyline to the game. Once more, NBA 2K20 has the MyTeam mode that wants to have a legitimate assembling and keep up a virtual plan of exchanging card. Players get together and play in a restriction style conflict in various plans. For a get-together, resources are gotten by techniques for various procedures, for example, the arrangement house and erratic card packs. In this mode, Virtual Currency is also utilized a noteworthy amount.Achievement of chartbuster Binance Support displays how versatile Binance Support can be an unprecedented wellspring of pay for certain fashioners. Notwithstanding, to appear at their target these Binance Support need essentially more than a dominating storyline, an interfacing with instinct, and top notch depictions. To spread it out basically, it needs a more vital number of fragments than what Binance Support as an organizer alone can give; it needs channels to reach to its possible clients. By a wide margin a large portion of the Binance Support, whose occurrences of overcoming pain may have energized Binance Support, have begun their excursion from to some degree base of clients, who supported the game, presented it to their related players and made the game a full scale achievement. In any case, to appear at that little base of clients, who can make an adaptable game a sensation in the gaming business, is truly not a little accomplishment and that deduces it will require attempts. Following the brand name strategy for spreading the game through normal mediums, similar to Binance Supportr companions, supporters, basic web searcher results, and so on just by and large makes the best outcomes. Likewise, the approach included is dreary to such a degree, that when Binance Supportr game appears at the best of the gathering, Binance Supportr thought may have gotten somewhat obsolete, inferable from the energetic pace of the business. In this manner, if Binance Support really need to get the best yields for Binance Supportr game, Binance Support ought to consider Binance Supportr propelling system, and publicizing isn't the least imperative of them. Through this article, we'll see how through publicizing, and different mediums, Binance Support can overhaul the client ensuring about for Binance Supportr game. Understand the Terminology:- if Binance Support're utilizing search ads, and that solidifies the presentation and different structures of headways, by then it is basic to see several terms that would help Binance With supporting in upgrading Binance Supportr attempts. CTR-Click Through Rate tells how routinely Binance Supportr notice was clicked coming about to showing up on SERPs. IR-This is significant for application sees through which clients are immediate taken to the current page of the game. Familiarize Rate reveals with Binance Support what number of clients have introduced Binance Supportr game. A/B Test-It is fundamentally ridiculous that Binance Support will get the ideal headway on the first go. In like way, experimentation is in many cases seen as the technique for all the progression makers. To streamline, or rather, sort out these endeavors for extended length planning and announcing purposes, it is recommended to follow the exhibits of A/B Testing to get to Binance Supportr best-changing over business genuine speedy. Make a reasonable business substance and nearly unbelievable substance with the end goal of appearance. For business, the substance ought to be new yet convincing one. Recognizing Binance Supportr masterminded gathering will give genuine assistance here. Acknowledge what things sales to the gathering Binance Support're focusing on, and some time later undertaking to recollect those sections for the substance. On this explanation, Binance Support may correspondingly pick the situation, its picture, and the portrayal. Tallying positive audits of the game and screen gets moreover describe the basic bits of the game application content, most clients have concurred of seeing checking these two things before whatever else in the substance. Other than that, ensure that the substance lights up as much concerning the game as is essential for any intense part regardless it with no issue. Moreover, try to fuse understanding parts like drawing in portrayals and beguiling substance with the target that the odds of changes are at the most preposterous. Any dependable game improvement affiliation can uncover to Binance Support this – removing all the bugs from the game is basically deficient if the download relationship of Binance Supportr game is broken. Binance Support needn't waste time with Binance Supportr game to get into the loathsome books of Binance Supportr exceptional gamers out of this modest issue, isn't that so? Thusly, guarantee it is phenomenally clear for Binance Supportr clients to download the game, when all Binance Supportr set conditions, similar to terms and conditions understanding and bit (anticipating any), are met. To get more clients, Binance Support can try the free-demo method. Award the clients to play the demo level futile, or permit them to introduce the main level of a critical event that will expend less room on their contraption. Doing so will shield from pulling off colossal numbers. Right when Binance Support have put resources into game movement benefits and have built up a really stupefying game, it would be completely undeserving to pick its client procurement. Given the obstruction in the market and the consistent changes in the market structures, it is fundamental for Binance Support to win whatever number clients in the basic barely any weeks as would be sensible. Binance Support can generally refresh Binance Supportr game later on as shown by the necessities of the time, yet those endeavors would not pass on Binance Support enough common things if Binance Support don't beginning at now have a solid base of clients. In like way, putting resources into client obtaining, with complete method, is an undeniable essential if Binance Support truly need Binance Supportr game to be an accomplishment in the market and industry. Thusly, eventually Binance Support know how Binance Support can smooth out Binance Supportr endeavors for client securing with most remarkable suitability. To likewise improve the monetisation of Binance Supportr game thought, one course is to have it made with the parts that advance Binance Supportr odds of pay streaming, and who can do this better than an office that has been making such blockbuster and ROI-driven Binance Support for a critical long time? Innovative Studio is a given game improvement affiliation that has been making gaming applications all through late years. For more data, visit u/binance interface with our specialists today!

Binance supports upgrades in affiliations related with blockchain and mixed cash and their on - the-stage control and inaccessible parts. Binance for the most part offers purchasers the ability to trade, buy/sell and hold moved kinds of money. It's an open entryways for 2 kinds of electronic cash corporatism, the first is fundamental corporatism, and in like way the second is an unrivaled corporatism. Binance Customer Support Number 1-877-566-6366 Buyers are wailing after these central fixations and grants for Binance crypto exchange. Considering demanded traffic on the systems, Binance Support Tollfree Number +1-877-566-6366 We've 24 hr. customer help social events to deal with your issues with the trading of Bitcoin, Blockchain. Binance Customer Support Number 1-877-566-6366
submitted by RiseExpert to u/RiseExpert [link] [comments]

Bluzelle AMA with CEO Pavel Bains on Community Telegram

Today August 11th 2020 , Pavel Bains (CEO of Bluzelle) connected with the community in the Bluzelle telegram group to answer all questions relating to #staking on #BluzelleNet. Following the postponing of the Mainnet launch due to the Cosmos chain upgrade, questions have arised concerning the Mainnet launch, Staking economics and the plans for the project.
It was to be in two parts. First was an interview session with Darshan. Then the next session was for community members to ask their individual questions.
Pavel gave insightful and satisfying answers to the questions and even shared his thoughts on the current DeFi boom.
Below are the questions and answers of the interview session by Darshan.
Darshan: Hello Pavel, glad to have you in this AMA session. Hope you’re doing well?
Pavel Bains: Doing great.
Darshan : Good to know!
So let’s start with our First Question!
A lot of community members were happy by looking at the project development but then they know about the delay in soft-mainnet, could you tell us what is the main reason?
Pavel Bains : As most people are aware, we built our blockchain (BluzelleNet) with Tendermint (by Cosmos). Because we are using the latest version, they wanted to make sure everything is secure. So they asked us to take a bit of extra time as they were updating some things on their end.
We want to make sure we test it well beforehand.
I think most of the crypto community are good with this as we aren’t the only ones who had to push mainnet because of these reasons.
Darshan : Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Q2. How would staking in Bluzelle be like? When would the Bluzelle community members be able to stake their BLZ?
Pavel Bains : We will have our staking dashboard up. Its the same one we used during our testnet with some revisions. Community members will be able to go there and create their BluzelleNet wallet then choose to stake with one of the validators.
We’re also talking to other wallets to support Bluzelle so people can stake right through there.
We’ll put out a guide too.
Also, people need to keep in mind this is a soft-mainnet launch. Some things could change in terms of functions between phase and phase 2. Thats why we are breaking it up so there is a smooth transition.
Planning to give dates in the next 48 hours.
Darshan : Interesting, most of our community members were eagerly waiting to hear this. Thank you!
Q3. What are the major milestones Bluzelle has achieved in the past 2 quarters of 2020 and what can our community members expect in the near future?
Pavel Bains : The biggest would be:
The above gave us great confidence at the end of June. It helped us form our plans for the rest of the year. Where to spend our energy and how to build up the community support.
Going forward we have focused on four things: — Successfully launching the mainnet in its phases — Launching the defi/data product — User adoption in terms of partners, use cases and developers — wider adoption and use of $BLZ
Darshan : Impressive, I’m excited to see DeFi Data Product, when would it launch? Can you give us ETA for our community members?
Pavel Bains : Sometime between Mainnet Phase 1 and Phase 2. 😉
Darshan : Awesome 😊
Q4. Why a database like Bluzelle is needed in the Crypto space? Do you think that large institutions would ever switch to decentralize databases like Bluzelle
Pavel Bains : Crypto needs a Bluzelle for a few reasons:
  1. Dapps currently are using centralized tech as the majority of their stack. This defeats the purpose.
  2. Bluzelle gives great privacy and availability than others.
  3. As more users come on board to Defi platforms and regulations, they will need to manage data in a certain way that blockchains can’t. NoSQL type databases like Bluzelle are best to deliver that. Bluzelle is the only decentralized DB ready for these products.
Large institutions will adopt Bluzelle. I just don’t think its’ right now. They will see the crypto space growing and products being secure. That will give them confidence to use our tech. It will be battle tested.
Any product saying that large instiutions will use them right now are very un-realistic.
Darshan : 100% agree with your last point
Q5 Recent partnership news with HedgeTrade, Matic & Elrond were really great. Can we expect more such partnerships in the near future?
Pavel Bains : Yes those are just the start. We have many more in the works and many inquiries being made.
Darshan : Good to know!
Last question : Can Bluzelle database work with Oracle solutions? What are your thoughts about the DeFi boom?
Pavel Bains : Defi show that the first crypto use case is still the best use case. Make money
I think Defi is great as it shows strong usage and innovation. That will bring more products to the market, meaning more customers for Bluzelle. 😃
Bluzelle can definately works with oracle solutions. The defi product we are working on is highly related to it.
Darshan : Haha true that
I’m opening the floor for Community Questions.
The group was then opened for community members to ask their questions.
Community Member 1 :
Everyone is talking about Bluzelle staking now. Can you please explain why you came up with this? How many tokens has been allocated for Bluzelle staking and what are the rewards?
Pavel Bains :
We wanted a system that will encourage people to come in early but also won’t let whales who come late to do better than the early people. So we designed it in a way to encourage participation with all.
We’ve allocated 10% of the token supply over 4 years. Year 1: 20M Year 2: 15M Year 3: 10M Year 4: 5M
The rewards will range for people depending on when they come in. More people that join, more rewards distributed to everyone.
Community Member 2 :
Are there staking platform options to choose from? If there are, what are these platforms?
Pavel Bains :
For Phase 1, we’ll focus on Bluzelle’s own staking dashboard. We are currently engaging with other wallets and platforms.
Community Member 3 :
Q. Staking over ethereum through own wallet is being costly day by day due to network congestion and high fees of ethereum transactions so if anything possible for pool staking which can help more to even earn high rewards?
Pavel Bains :
Great question. We’ve noticed this and are working on a solution that will allow for pool staking. We will release this in the next two weeks. 😁
Community Member 4 :
Hie Sir @pavelbains When Can we Expect the Exchange STAKING.
Pavel Bains :
Between Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Community Member 5 :
When BNT to BLZ token swap?
Pavel Bains :
We won’t have a full swap yet. We are going to operate on a two token system (ERC 20 and Bluzelle Native) for a certain period. One being we have certain things planned for ethereum and want to make best of both worlds for token holders.
Community Member 6 :
When can we able to see Bluzelle Messenger in process ? Are there any specific functions compared to other messenger apps ?
Pavel Bains :
We are currently going through the testing of it and working on refinements. The basic functions will be same as all apps. The decentralized aspect will make it stronger. Plus we can add future crypto related features to it.
Community Member 7 :
Security, Interoperability and Scalability are very important factors for any Blockchain Project. What solution does the Bluzelle project have on these problems ?
Pavel Bains :
Interoperability — we are working with Cosmos. This makes us widely available to all blockchains. Security — decentralized database powered by validators that ensure only the owner can change the data Scalability — having thousands of nodes as our network makes it available everywhere and fast.
Community Member 8 :
What do you see as the biggest technical hurdle for 2020 ?
Pavel Bains :
Getting the mainnet launched and having an easy way for ERC 20 tokens to be bridged to Bluzelle and then available to Cosmos ecosystem.
Community Member 9 :
Can anybody on same network look at the data stored on their machine?
Pavel Bains :
No. The data is not available to the person running the machine/node.
Community Member 10 :
How much BLZ the validator needs to stake at least
Pavel Bains :
Just 1. But that may not give them much power or rewards or people wanting to delegate.
AFTER ANSWERING ALL QUESTIONS SUFFICIENTLY, PAVEL BAINS ALLOWED FOR ANOTHER ROUND OF QUESTIONS.
Community Member 1 :
Hi Pavel, really great work from you and your team, keep it up.
Q: You mentioned earlier that you are working / partnering wit a top 25 crypto project. Can you elaborate more on that? When will you announce more info about that?
Pavel Bains :
We cannot give any more details at this time. But will announce in the next 2–3 weeks.
Community Member 2 :
Hello Pavel Many blockchains have their exchange apps When should we expect Bluzelle’s own.
Also when is the softnet now fixed?
Pavel Bains :
We can update on Mainnet tomorrow.
Don’t understand the exchange apps question.
Community Member 3 :
Will we be able to stake $BLZ on platforms like atomic wallet
Pavel Bains :
We are in talks with wallets to support Bluzelle. :)
Community Member 4 :
when does staking start… this week? Next week? or has it been postponed?
Pavel Bains :
Targeting this week.
Community Member 5 :
50 million is just an extra reward, the developer paid BLZ.
Pavel Bains :
50 Million is over 4 years. It’s part of the token supply we had set aside for this.
Better to look at 20M the first year, which is 4% of the total supply.
Community Member 6 :
Hi Pavel. I would love to know what exact DeFi solutions Bluzelle would be offering.???
Pavel Bains :
If we said it, we’d let the cat out of the bag. We want to announce it with a full description.
Community Member 7 :
Hi Pavel,I will like to know if we can stake on binance also I will like to know if BLZ plans to list on Korean exchanges
Pavel Bains :
We are speaking with all the exchanges that support Bluzelle to make staking available so their users have easy accessibility.
THAT WAS THE END OF THE SECOND ROUND OF QUESTIONS.
Yingyao Xie : Ok thanks for this Pavel. Really great session. Before we close off the AMA, do you have any final comments that would be good for the community?
Pavel Bains : Yes.
The next month will be very exciting as more announcements will come. As you saw, today we announced the USD stablecoin pairs with Binance.
The online support and community building from everyone has been outstanding. We are definately getting the BLZ word around. Especially with Filecoin being released soon, we are in a good position to be a complementary product to them.
Though this was a focused AMA for this hour.As you know, I jump on TG throughout the day to answer questions or give more info.
I think next time I want to answer these in video format. Make it different. 😁
And that was the end of the AMA session. Great news and updates from the CEO himself on Bluzelle.
Learn more about Bluzelle :
WEBSITE : https://bluzelle.com/ BLOG : https://blog.bluzelle.com/@Bluzelle DEVELOPERS : https://docs.bluzelle.com/developers/ TWITTER : https://twitter.com/BluzelleHQ
submitted by Rahul_2503 to Bluzelle [link] [comments]

How to create Binance account and transfer money How to Transfer Funds to Your Binance Futures Account - Binance Guides How To Deposit On Binance HOW TO FUND BINANCE ACCOUNT IN 30 SECONDS *DEPOSIT/WITHDRAW* How to use BINANCE Exchange (Beginners Guide) 2018

You can not add money, you can only transfer coins like etherium, bitcoin and then buy other coins like ripple, litecoin, trx, monero. The Lore of Binance. Binance was founded in China in 2017 by Changpeng Zhao and Yi He. He and Zhao both worked at the OKCoin exchange before deciding to build their crypto exchange.. The company was forced to leave China in September 2017 after the Chinese government banned cryptocurrency trading. As for the limitations, they add: "We just do not have access to margin and future trading." In June 2019, Binance confirmed that it would enter the U.S. market and launch Binance.US, which indeed happened in September 2019. It also stated that, starting September 12, their clients from the U.S. would no longer be able to trade on Binance.com. Hence, Binance Leveraged Tokens rebalance during extreme market movements only. The rebalancing of Binance Leveraged Tokens positions is governed by Binance proprietary algorithms. Binance aims to maximize the correlation between the Binance Leveraged Tokens and the underlying margin-Leveraged position. To start buying crypto on Binance, all you need is an email to sign up or login. Register Now. 2. Verify and add card. Get your account verified and add your preferred Visa card to your account. 3. Start buying. Now you’re ready to buy Crypto of your choice with your Visa card. Watch video.

[index] [43] [548] [184] [232] [554] [386] [114] [270] [454] [299]

How to create Binance account and transfer money

Further, I have another video I will post later today explaining why you should be using Binance and the special experiment we will be doing with our Binance account and everyone on our team. Hello, my name is Maria Achilleos I am a full time iCoinPro day trader. I share iCoinPro with everyone that wants to learn how to trade Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. In this video you can watch ... If you're brand new to crypto, you might have just purchased your first Bitcoin or Ethereum, but you probably want to jump into other assets like Ripple, Car... https://www.binance.com/?ref=11688995 Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=brandon71101 Receive $10 worth of Bitcoin when you set up your coinbase wallet and buy ... visit us on https://mybotgarage.com. OUR SECRET BITCOIN TARGET + FINALLY PASSING LEGENDARY 10.5K (REACTION) btc news today xrp ethereum - Duration: 37:35. Crypto Crew University 20,934 views. New

#